Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36431608›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Advancements in the Additive Manufacturing of Magnesium and Aluminum Alloys through Laser-Based Approach.

Sachin Kumar Sharma, Harpreet Singh Grewal, Kuldeep Kumar Saxena, Kahtan A Mohammed, Chander Prakash, J Paulo Davim, Dharam Buddhi, Ramesh Raju, Dhanesh G Mohan, Jacek Tomków

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sachin Kumar SharmaSurface Science and Tribology Lab, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Shiv Nadar Institute of Eminence, Gautam Buddha Nagar 201314, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID 0000-0002-8859-4709
Harpreet Singh GrewalSurface Science and Tribology Lab, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Shiv Nadar Institute of Eminence, Gautam Buddha Nagar 201314, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Kuldeep Kumar SaxenaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, GLA University, Mathura 281406, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4064-5113
Kahtan A MohammedDepartment of Medical Physics, Hilla University College, Babylon 51002, Iraq.
Chander PrakashDivision of Research and Development, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara 144001, Punjab, India.
J Paulo DavimDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Aveiro, Campus Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-5659-3111
Dharam BuddhiDivision of Research & Innovation, Uttaranchal University, Dehradun 248007, Uttarakhand, India.ORCID 0000-0001-7305-0795
Ramesh RajuDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Sree Vidyanikethan Engineering College (Autonomous), Tirupathi 517102, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Dhanesh G MohanDepartment of Material Processing Engineering, Zhengzhou Research Institute of Harbin Institute of Technology, Zhengzhou 450002, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4652-4198
Jacek TomkówFaculty of Mechanical Engineering and Ship Technology, Gdańsk University of Technology, 80-229 Gdańsk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1096-7779

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complex structures can now be manufactured easily utilizing AM technologies to meet the pre-requisite objectives such as reduced part numbers, greater functionality, and lightweight, among others. Polymers, metals, and ceramics are the few materials that can be used in AM technology, but metallic materials (Magnesium and Aluminum) are attracting more attention from the research and industrial point of view. Understanding the role processing parameters of laser-based additive manufacturing is critical to maximize the usage of material in forming the product geometry. LPBF (Laser powder-based fusion) method is regarded as a potent and effective additive manufacturing technique for creating intricate 3D forms/parts with high levels of precision and reproducibility together with acceptable metallurgical characteristics. While dealing with LBPF, some degree of porosity is acceptable because it is unavoidable; hot ripping and cracking must be avoided, though. The necessary manufacturing of pre-alloyed powder and ductility remains to be the primary concern while dealing with a laser-based additive manufacturing approach. The presence of the Al-Si eutectic phase in AlSi10Mg and AlSi12 alloy attributing to excellent castability and low shrinkage, attaining the most attention in the laser-based approach. Related studies with these alloys along with precipitation hardening and heat treatment processing were discussed. The Pure Mg, Mg-Al alloy, Mg-RE alloy, and Mg-Zn alloy along with the mechanical characteristics, electrochemical durability, and biocompatibility of Mg-based material have been elaborated in the work-study. The review article also summarizes the processing parameters of the additive manufacturing powder-based approach relating to different Mg-based alloys. For future aspects, the optimization of processing parameters, composition of the alloy, and quality of powder material used will significantly improve the ductility of additively manufactured Mg alloy by the LPBF approach. Other than that, the recycling of Mg-alloy powder hasn't been investigated yet. Meanwhile, the post-processing approach, including a homogeneous coating on the porous scaffolds, will mark the suitability in terms of future advancements in Mg and Al-based alloys.

Indexed as

aluminumlaser-based powder fusionmagnesiummechanical characteristicspost-processing approachprocessing parameters

Identifiers

PMID36431608
PMCPMC9698782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.