ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Experimental and Numerical Analysis of Chlorinated Polyethylene Honeycomb Mechanical Performance as Opposed to an Aluminum Alloy Design.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Manufacturing aircraft components through 3D printing has become a widespread concept with proven applicability for serial production of certain structural parts. The main objective of the research study is to determine whether a chlorinated polyethylene material reinforced with milled carbon fibers has the potential of replacing the current 5052 NIDA aluminum alloy core of the IAR330 helicopter tail rotor blade, under the form of a honeycomb structure with hexagonal cells. Achieving this purpose implied determining the tensile and compression mechanical properties of the material realized by fused deposition modeling. The tensile tests have been conducted on specimens manufactured on three printing directions, so that the orthotropic nature of the material may be taken into account. The bare compression tests were realized on specimens manufactured from both materials, with similar honeycomb characteristics. All the mechanical tests have been performed on the Instron 8872 servo hydraulic testing system and the results have been evaluated with the Dantec Q400 Digital Image Correlation system. The experimental tests have been reproduced as finite element analyses which have been validated by results comparison, in order to determine if the compression model is viable for more complex numerical analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.