ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Prediction of Strength Properties of Concrete Containing Waste Marble Aggregate and Stone Dust-Modeling and Optimization Using RSM.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modeling and optimization of sustainable ternary concrete incorporating rice husk ash and extracted micro silica.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Performance analysis of fiber reinforced recycled aggregate concrete at elevated temperatures using response surface methodology.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Optimizing concrete sustainability with bagasse ash and stone dust and its impact on mechanical properties and durability.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Predicting High-Strength Concrete's Compressive Strength: A Comparative Study of Artificial Neural Networks, Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System, and Response Surface Methodology.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Research on mechanical properties of concrete by nano-TiC-BF-fly ash.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Eco-Friendly Sustainable Concrete and Mortar Using Coal Dust Waste.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Carbon footprint reduction, recompense depletion of natural resources, as well as waste recycling are nowadays focused research directions to achieve sustainability without compromising the concrete strength parameters. Therefore, the purpose of the present study is to utilize different dosages of marble waste aggregates (MWA) and stone dust (SD) as a replacement for coarse and fine aggregate, respectively. The MWA with 10 to 30% coarse aggregate replacement and SD with 40 to 50% fine aggregate replacement were used to evaluate the physical properties (workability and absorption), durability (acid attack resistance), and strength properties (compressive, flexural, and tensile strength) of concrete. Moreover, statistical modeling was also performed using response surface methodology (RSM) to design the experiment, optimize the MWA and SD dosages, and finally validate the experimental results. Increasing MWA substitutions resulted in higher workability, lower absorption, and lower resistance to acid attack as compared with controlled concrete. However, reduced compressive strength, flexural strength, and tensile strength at 7-day and 28-day cured specimens were observed as compared to the controlled specimen. On the other hand, increasing SD content causes a reduction in workability, higher absorption, and lower resistance to acid attack compared with controlled concrete. Similarly, 7-day and 28-day compressive strength, flexural strength, and tensile strength of SD-substituted concrete showed improvement up to 50% replacement and a slight reduction at 60% replacement. However, the strength of SD substituted concrete is higher than controlled concrete. Quadratic models were suggested based on a higher coefficient of determination (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.