ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Evaluation of Heat-Induced Damage in Concrete Using Machine Learning of Ultrasonic Pulse Waves.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigated the applicability of using ultrasonic wave signals in detecting early fire damage in concrete. This study analyzed the reliability of using the linear (wave velocity) and nonlinear (coherence) parameters from ultrasonic pulse measurements and the applicability of machine learning in assessing the thermal damage of concrete cylinders. While machine learning has been used in some damage detections for concrete, its feasibility has not been fully investigated in classifying thermal damage. Data was collected from laboratory experiments using concrete specimens with three different water-to-binder ratios (0.54, 0.46, and 0.35). The specimens were subjected to different target temperatures (100 °C, 200 °C, 300 °C, 400 °C, and 600 °C) and another set of cylinders was subjected to room temperature (20 °C) to represent the normal temperature condition. It was observed that P-wave velocities increased by 0.1% to 10.44% when the concretes were heated to 100 °C, and then decreased continuously until 600 °C by 48.46% to 65.80%. Conversely, coherence showed a significant decrease after exposure to 100 °C but had fluctuating values in the range of 0.110 to 0.223 thereafter. In terms of classifying the thermal damage of concrete, machine learning yielded an accuracy of 76.0% while the use of P-wave velocity and coherence yielded accuracies of 30.26% and 32.31%, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.