Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36431338›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Influence of Fracture Reduction on the Functional Outcome after Intramedullary Nail Osteosynthesis in Proximal Humerus Fractures.

Annika Hättich, Tim Jodokus Harloff, Hatice Sari, Carsten Schlickewei, Christopher Cramer, André Strahl, Karl-Heinz Frosch, Konrad Mader, Till Orla Klatte

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Clinical validation of the DRoPH score: a preoperative tool for estimating reduction difficulty in proximal humerus fractures.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Annika HättichDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Tim Jodokus HarloffDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Hatice SariDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4042-7757
Carsten SchlickeweiDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Christopher CramerDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
André StrahlDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Karl-Heinz FroschDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Konrad MaderDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4514-4836
Till Orla KlatteDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Universität Hamburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Optimal treatment of proximal humeral fractures (PHF) is still controversial. Therefore, we aim to investigate the influence of fracture reduction after intramedullary nailing of a PHF on the clinical outcome. Methods: Patients treated with intramedullary nail for PHF from 2013−2018, (minimum follow-up 12 months) were retrospectively included. Constant Score (CS), DASH and Simple Shoulder Test (SST) were collected. Postoperative radiographs were used to determine head-shaft-alignment (HSA), head-shaft-displacement (HSD), integrity of the medial hinge and the cranialization of the greater tuberosity (CGT). The results of fracture reduction were categorized as either “anatomical”, “acceptable” or as “malreduction”. Malreduction exists when at least one of the following parameters are present: HSA > 150/< 110°, HSD >5 mm, CTM > 5 mm or lack of integrity of the medial hinge. Results: 42 patients (mean age 65.5 ± 14.1 years, 15 male, 27 female) with a mean follow-up time of 43 months were included. The average CS was 60 ± 30, DASH 49.8 ± 24.3 and SST 62.9 ± 26.9. There was an “anatomic” reduction in 9 (21.4%), “acceptable” in 7 (16.6%) and a “malreduction” in 26 (62%) patients. Comparing the combined “anatomical” and “acceptable” reduction group with the “malreduction” group, worse scores were observed in the “malreduction” group (CS 67.2 vs. 55.2, DASH 45.2 vs. 51.9, SST: 69.3 vs. 58.6) without statistical significance (CS: p = 0.095, DASH: p = 0.307, SST: p = 0.400). By means of multiple logistic regression analyses no statistically significant risk factors were identified for lower DASH, CS and SST scores. Conclusions: Anatomical fracture reduction using intramedullary nails has a positive effect on postoperative outcome for the 3 scores recorded, without reaching statistical significance.

Indexed as

fracture reductionproximal humerusshoulder

Identifiers

PMID36431338
PMCPMC9697579
OpenAlexW4309787138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.