ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022
Cardiovascular Risk Profile and Lipid Management in the Population-Based Cohort Study LATINO: 20 Years of Real-World Data.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of Risk Stratification Tools for Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease and Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Syndrome in Primary Care.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Observational
- Real-world prescribing in accordance to ACC/AHA guidelines for lipid-lowering therapy in high-risk primary and secondary prevention of ASCVD: Real-World Prescribing for Lipid-Lowering Therapy.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2025Article
- Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Target Attainment in Lithuania: A Nationwide Analysis of Real-World Health Data.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Lipid-lowering prescription patterns after a non-fatal acute coronary syndrome: A retrospective cohort study.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2025Article
- Assessing LDL-C Levels and Lipid-Modifying Therapies in a Real-World Cohort of Patients with Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: The REALITY Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Five-Year Trends in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Management in a Primary Healthcare Centre in Kaunas.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
- Patients' health care resources utilization and costs estimation across cardiovascular risk categories: insights from the LATINO study.Health economics review · 2024Article
- Cardiovascular Risk in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Cardiovascular risk profile with SCORE2 and SCORE2-OP: comparing Portugal, Spain, Italy, and France using the new European predictive models.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Attainment of LDL-Cholesterol Goals in Patients with Previous Myocardial Infarction: A Real-World Cross-Sectional Analysis.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rising prevalence of cardiovascular (CV) risk factors in Portugal has translated into more than 35,000 annual deaths due to CV diseases. We performed a multicenter observational cohort study encompassing clinical activities performed between 2000 and 2019 to characterize the CV risk profile and LDL-C management of patients in every CV risk category using electronic health records of a regional population in Portugal. We analyzed data from 14 health centers and 1 central hospital in the north of Portugal of patients between 40 and 80 years that had at least 1 family medicine appointment at these institutions. Living patients were characterized on 31 December 2019. CV risk assessment was computed according to the 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines. Lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) and achievement of LDL-C targets were assessed. In total, the analysis included 78,459 patients. Patient proportions were 33%, 29%, 22%, and 17% for low, intermediate, high, and very high CV risk, respectively. Moderate-intensity statins were the most frequently used medication across all CV risk categories. High-intensity statins were used in 5% and 10% of high and very high CV risk patients, respectively. Ezetimibe was used in 6% and 10% of high and very high CV risk patients, respectively. LDL-C targets were achieved in 44%, 27%, 7%, and 3% of low, intermediate, high, and very high CV risk patients, respectively. For uncontrolled patients in the high and very high CV risk categories, a median LDL-C reduction of 44% and 53%, respectively, would be required to meet LDL-C targets. There are clear opportunities to optimize LDL-C management in routine clinical practice. The prescription of LLT according to CV risk represents an important missed treatment opportunity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.