Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36431294›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Renal Protection and Hemodynamic Improvement by Impella

Nikolaos Patsalis, Julian Kreutz, Georgios Chatzis, Styliani Syntila, Sebastian Griewing, Carly Pirlet-Grant, Malte Schlegel, Bernhard Schieffer, Birgit Markus

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Mechanical circulatory support reduces renal sympathetic nerve activity in an ovine model of acute myocardial infarction.Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nikolaos PatsalisDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Philipps University Marburg, 35043 Marburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5479-967X
Julian KreutzDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Philipps University Marburg, 35043 Marburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9498-9558
Georgios ChatzisDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Philipps University Marburg, 35043 Marburg, Germany.
Styliani SyntilaDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Philipps University Marburg, 35043 Marburg, Germany.
Sebastian GriewingDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Philipps University Marburg, 35043 Marburg, Germany.
Carly Pirlet-GrantDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Philipps University Marburg, 35043 Marburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4776-0552
Malte SchlegelDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Philipps University Marburg, 35043 Marburg, Germany.
Bernhard SchiefferDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Philipps University Marburg, 35043 Marburg, Germany.
Birgit MarkusDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Philipps University Marburg, 35043 Marburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0485-5722
Philipps University of Marburg · DE

Funding

Abiomed (United States) #10881
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute kidney injury is one of the most frequent and prognostically relevant complications in cardiogenic shock. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential effect of the Impella® pump on hemodynamics and renal organ perfusion in patients with myocardial infarction complicating cardiogenic shock. Between January 2020 and February 2022 patients with infarct-related cardiogenic shock supported with the Impella® pump were included in this single-center prospective short-term study. Changes in hemodynamics on different levels of Impella® support were documented with invasive pulmonal arterial catheter. As far as renal function is concerned, renal perfusion was assessed by determining the renal resistive index (RRI) using Doppler sonography. A total of 50 patients were included in the analysis. The increase in the Impella® output by a mean of 1.0 L/min improved the cardiac index (2.7 ± 0.86 to 3.3 ± 1.1 p < 0.001) and increased central venous oxygen saturation (62.6 ± 11.8% to 67.4 ± 10.5% p < 0.001). On the other side, the systemic vascular resistance (1035 ± 514 N·s/m5 to 902 ± 371 N·s/m5p = 0.012) and the RRI were significantly reduced (0.736 ± 0.07 to 0.62 ± 0.07 p < 0.001). Furthermore, in the overall cohort, a baseline RRI ≥ 0.8 was associated with a higher frequency of renal replacement therapy (71% vs. 39% p = 0.04), whereas the consequent reduction of the RRI below 0.7 during Impella® support improved the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) during hospital stay (15 ± 3 days; 53 ± 16 mL/min to 83 ± 16 mL/min p = 0.04). Impella® support in patients with cardiogenic shock seems to improve hemodynamics and renal organ perfusion. The RRI, a well-known parameter for the early detection of acute kidney injury, can be directly influenced by the Impella® flow rate. Thus, a targeted control of the RRI by the Impella® pump could mediate renal organ protection.

Indexed as

cardiogenic shockhemodynamicsImpella®renal organ protectionrenal resistive index

Identifiers

PMID36431294
PMCPMC9698353
OpenAlexW4309288343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.