Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36431269›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Possibility of Neoadjuvant Treatment for Radiologically Judged Resectable Pancreatic Cancer.

Takehiro Okabayashi, Kenta Sui, Motoyasu Tabuchi, Takahiro Murokawa, Shinichi Sakamoto, Jun Iwata, Sojiro Morita, Nobuto Okamoto, Tatsuo Iiyama, Yasuhiro Shimada and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Takehiro OkabayashiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kochi Health Sciences Center, Kochi 781-8555, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4829-4306
Kenta SuiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kochi Health Sciences Center, Kochi 781-8555, Japan.
Motoyasu TabuchiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kochi Health Sciences Center, Kochi 781-8555, Japan.
Takahiro MurokawaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kochi Health Sciences Center, Kochi 781-8555, Japan.
Shinichi SakamotoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kochi Health Sciences Center, Kochi 781-8555, Japan.
Jun IwataDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology, Kochi Health Sciences Center, Kochi 781-8555, Japan.
Sojiro MoritaDepartment of Radiology, Kochi Health Sciences Center, Kochi 781-8555, Japan.
Nobuto OkamotoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kochi Medical School, Kochi 783-8505, Japan.
Tatsuo IiyamaDepartment of Biostatistics, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo 162-8655, Japan.
Yasuhiro ShimadaDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Kochi Health Sciences Center, Kochi 781-8555, Japan.
Toshiyoshi FujiwaraDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Okayama University, Okayama 700-8530, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5377-6051
Kochi Medical School Hospital · JPNational Center for Global Health and Medicine · JPOkayama University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Survival remains poor even after resection of pancreatic cancer and the postoperative recurrence rate is extremely high. Thus, neoadjuvant treatment may improve outcomes for resectable pancreatic cancer (RPC). This study evaluated the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy for radiologically judged RPC. A prospectively maintained institutional database was reviewed to identify patients who underwent potentially curative resection of radiologically judged RPC. Patient characteristics and intermediate-term outcomes were compared between groups that received neoadjuvant treatment or upfront surgery (UFS). We identified 353 eligible patients, including 55 patients who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT group), 53 patients who received neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP group), and 245 patients who underwent UFS (UFS group). The cumulative rates of pancreatic cancer recurrence at 2 years after pancreatic surgery were 49.5% in the UFS, 48.1% in the CRT group, and 52.7% in the GnP group. The recurrence rate tended to be improved after neoadjuvant treatment, although the difference was not significant at this follow-up point. While the clinical TNM classifications were noticeably different from the final pathological findings, the clinical and pathological TNM classifications were more similar in the groups that underwent neoadjuvant treatment. Neoadjuvant treatment can help identify good surgical candidates and avoid unnecessary laparotomy. Our results also suggest that neoadjuvant therapy might help improve the preoperative diagnostic accuracy for patients with RPC.

Indexed as

neoadjuvant therapypancreatic cancersurgery

Identifiers

PMID36431269
PMCPMC9698623
OpenAlexW4309267356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.