ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022
Outcomes and Predictors of Failure of Ultrasound Cyclo Plasty for Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Efficacy of Ultrasound Cycloplasty for Glaucoma Patients and Pathological Observation on the Ciliary Body in Rabbit Models.Journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Efficacy of ultrasound cyclo-plasty in treatment of glaucoma in Asian population.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025Review
- Comparison of the efficacy and safety of ultrasonic cycloplastyInternational journal of ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Efficacy and safety of ultrasound cycloplasty for the treatment of glaucoma: a Meta-analysis.International journal of ophthalmology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: To evaluate the outcomes of ultrasound cyclo plasty (UCP) for primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and identify the predictors of failure. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients with POAG who underwent UCP at King Abdul Aziz University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, between 2016 and 2021. The main outcome measures were the intraocular pressure (IOP), the number of antiglaucoma medications, and the presence of vision-threatening complications. The surgical outcome of each eye was based on the main outcome measures. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was performed to identify the possible predictors of UCP failure. Results: Sixty-six eyes of fifty-five patients were included herein. The mean follow-up period was 28.95 (±16.9) months. The mean IOP decreased significantly from 23.02 (±6.1) to 18.22 (±7.0) and 16.44 (±5.3) mm Hg on the 12th and 24th months, respectively; the mean number of antiglaucoma medications decreased significantly from 3.23 (±0.9) to 2.15 (±1.5) and 2.09 (±1.6), respectively. The cumulative probabilities of overall success were 71.2 ± 5.6% and 40.9 ± 6.1% on the 12th and 24th months, respectively. High baseline IOP and the number of antiglaucoma medications were associated with a higher risk of failure (hazard ratio = 1.10 and 3.01, p = 0.04 and p < 0.01, respectively). The most common complications were cataract development or progression (30.8%) and prolonged or rebound anterior chamber reaction (10.6%). Conclusions: UCP reasonably controls the IOP and reduces the antiglaucoma medication burden in eyes with POAG. Nevertheless, the success rate is modest, with a high baseline IOP and number of medications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.