Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36431237›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Factors Affecting Clinical over and Underestimation of Fetal Weight-A Retrospective Cohort.

Gal Cohen, Hila Shalev-Ram, Hanoch Schreiber, Omer Weitzner, Yair Daykan, Michal Kovo, Tal Biron-Shental

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gal CohenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Meir Medical Center, 59 Tchernichovsky St., Kfar Saba 44281, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-7944-0532
Hila Shalev-RamDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Meir Medical Center, 59 Tchernichovsky St., Kfar Saba 44281, Israel.
Hanoch SchreiberDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Meir Medical Center, 59 Tchernichovsky St., Kfar Saba 44281, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-5224-0813
Omer WeitznerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Meir Medical Center, 59 Tchernichovsky St., Kfar Saba 44281, Israel.
Yair DaykanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Meir Medical Center, 59 Tchernichovsky St., Kfar Saba 44281, Israel.
Michal KovoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Meir Medical Center, 59 Tchernichovsky St., Kfar Saba 44281, Israel.
Tal Biron-ShentalDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Meir Medical Center, 59 Tchernichovsky St., Kfar Saba 44281, Israel.
Tel Aviv University · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical estimation of fetal weight is an integral component of obstetric care that might dictate the timing and mode of delivery. Inaccurate fetal weight estimation might result in unnecessary interventions or in underestimating potential risks, resulting in inappropriate intrapartum care. This retrospective study assessed factors associated with under- or overestimation of birthweight and evaluated the obstetric implications. It included singleton births ≥24 w with clinically estimated fetal weight (EFW) up to 1 week before delivery, during 2014−2020. Estimates >±10% of the actual birthweight were considered inaccurate and categorized as overestimation (>10% heavier than the actual birthweight) or underestimation (>10% smaller than the birthweight). Multivariable logistic regression was performed to reveal factors associated with inaccurate EFW. Maternal characteristics and obstetric outcomes were compared. The primary outcomes for the overestimation group were the neonatal composite adverse outcome, induction of labor and cesarean delivery rates. The primary outcomes for the underestimation group were rates of shoulder dystocia, 3rd- or 4th-degree perineal lacerations, and failed vacuum extraction. Among 38,615 EFW, 5172 (13.4%) were underestimated, 6695 (17.3%) were overestimated and 27,648 (69.3%) accurate. Multivariable logistic regression found increasing gestational age as an independent risk-factor for underestimation (odds ratio (OR) 1.15 for every additional week, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12−1.2). Major factors independently associated with overestimation were nulliparity (OR 1.95, CI 1.76−2.16), maternal obesity (OR 1.52, CI 1.33−1.74), smoking (OR 1.6, CI 1.33−1.93), and oligohydramnios (OR 1.92, CI 1.47−2.5). Underestimation was an independent risk-factor for shoulder dystocia (OR 1.61, CI 1.05−2.46) and 3rd- or 4th-degree perineal lacerations (OR 1.59, CI 1.05−2.43). Overestimation was an independent risk-factor for neonatal composite adverse outcome (OR 1.15, CI 1.02−1.3), induced labor (OR 1.30, CI 1.21−1.40) and cesarean delivery (OR 1.59, CI 1.41−1.79). Clinicians should be aware of factors and adverse obstetric implications associated with over- or underestimation of birthweight.

Indexed as

clinical estimation of fetal birthweightinaccuracy in fetal weight estimationinaccurate fetal weight estimationoverestimation of fetal birthweightunderestimation of fetal birthweight

Identifiers

PMID36431237
PMCPMC9695931
OpenAlexW4309118877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.