Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36431168›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2022

Prevalence of Venous Thromboembolism in Intensive Care Units: A Meta-Analysis.

Xiaoyu Gao, Liangnan Zeng, Haorun Wang, Shan Zeng, Junjie Tian, Ligang Chen, Tangming Peng

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaoyu GaoGraduate School, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, China.
Liangnan ZengDepartment of Nursing, The Fifth Affiliated People's Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 610000, China.
Haorun WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0565-345X
Shan ZengDepartment of Neurosurgery, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, China.
Junjie TianDepartment of Neurosurgery, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, China.
Ligang ChenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, China.
Tangming PengDepartment of Neurosurgery, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1922-2511
Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University · CNChengdu Fifth People's Hospital · CNSouthwest Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveVenous thromboembolism (VTE) is a life threating complication in intensive care units (ICUs). This study aimed to pool the prevalence of VTE and examined the risk factors of VTE in intensive care patients worldwide.

methodsA systematic search in PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science databases was performed. Studies reported that the data on the prevalence of VTE or relevant information were synthesized using a random-effects model.

resultsA total of 42 studies reporting on 27,344 patients were included. The pooled prevalence of VTE was 10.0% (95% CI: 7.0-14.0%). Subgroup and metaregression analyses found that thromboprophylaxis strategy, simplified acute physiology score (SAPS II), age, study quality, sample size, malignancy, sex, spinal cord injury and injury severity score (ISS) moderated the prevalence of VTE in intensive care patients.

conclusionsThe present meta-analysis revealed a high prevalence of VTE in critically ill patients. The risk factors of VTE included thromboprophylaxis strategy, SAPS II, age, malignancy, sex, spinal cord injury and ISS. Therefore, we need to pay more attention to high-risk populations of VTE in intensive care patients.

Indexed as

intensive care unitmeta-analysisvenous thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID36431168
PMCPMC9698016
OpenAlexW4308975370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.