ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022
Employment of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation to Examine Muscle and Bone Qualities after Spinal Cord Injury.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recumbent FES-Cycling Exercise Improves Muscle Performance and Ambulation Capacity in Hospitalized Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Artificial organs · 2025Trial
- Electrical stimulation paradigms on muscle quality and bone mineral density after spinal cord injury.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025Trial
- Spinal Cord Ischemia After Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: Pathophysiology, Detection, and Management.Neurology international · 2026Review
- The Clinical Management of Electrical Stimulation Therapies in the Rehabilitation of Individuals with Spinal Cord Injuries.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Electrical Stimulation Exercise for People with Spinal Cord Injury: A Healthcare Provider Perspective.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
(1) Background: Resource intensive imaging tools have been employed to examine muscle and bone qualities after spinal cord injury (SCI). We tested the hypothesis that surface neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) amplitude can be used to examine knee extensor muscle quality, distal femur and proximal tibia bone mineral density (BMD) in persons with SCI. (2) Methods: Seventeen persons (2 women) with chronic SCI participated in three weeks of NMES-resistance training twice weekly of 4 sets of 10 repetitions. Participants were classified according to the current amplitude (>100 mA) and the number of repetitions (>70 reps) of leg extension into greater (n = 8; 1 woman; group A) and lower (n = 9; 1 woman; group B) musculoskeletal qualities. Magnetic resonance imaging, dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, isometric peak torque, Modified Ashworth and Penn spasm frequency scales were conducted. (3) Results: In between group comparisons, current amplitude was lower (38−46%) in group A. Whole (27−32%; p = 0.02), absolute (26−33%, p = 0.02) thigh muscle and absolute knee extensor muscle cross-sectional areas (22−33%, p = 0.04) were greater in group A. Right distal femur (24%; p = 0.08) and proximal tibia (29%; p = 0.03) BMDs were lower in group B, and peak isometric torque (p < 0.01), extensor spasticity scorers (p = 0.04) and muscle spasm scores (p = 0.002) were significantly higher in group A. Regression models revealed that amplitude of current, repetitions and body weight can accurately predict musculoskeletal qualities in persons with SCI. (4) Conclusions: Surface NMES amplitude and repetitions of leg extension differentiated between SCI survivors with greater versus lower musculoskeletal qualities. The study may shed the light on the interplay between muscle and bone in persons with SCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.