Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36431134›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2022

Pathophysiology, Diagnosis and Treatment of Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection in Peripartum Women.

Marta Cano-Castellote, Diego Fernando Afanador-Restrepo, Jhonatan González-Santamaría, Carlos Rodríguez-López, Yolanda Castellote-Caballero, Fidel Hita-Contreras, María Del Carmen Carcelén-Fraile, Agustín Aibar-Almazán

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Marta Cano-CastelloteDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Jaén, 23071 Jaén, Spain.
Diego Fernando Afanador-RestrepoFaculty of Distance and Virtual Education, Antonio José Camacho University Institution, Santiago de Cali 760016, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-7958-0751
Jhonatan González-SantamaríaZIPATEFI Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences and Sports, University Foundation of the Área Andina, Pereira 660001, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0001-9723-5612
Carlos Rodríguez-LópezLecturer University Schools Gimbernat, University of Cantabria, 39005 Santander, Spain.
Yolanda Castellote-CaballeroDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Jaén, 23071 Jaén, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6233-6787
Fidel Hita-ContrerasDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Jaén, 23071 Jaén, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7215-5456
María Del Carmen Carcelén-FraileDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Jaén, 23071 Jaén, Spain.
Agustín Aibar-AlmazánDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Jaén, 23071 Jaén, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9386-9199
Universidad de Jaén · ESInstitución Universitaria Antonio José Camacho · COTechnological University of Pereira · COUniversidad de Cantabria · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is an infrequent cause of nonobstructive ischemic heart disease in previously healthy young women and therefore is not usually considered in differential diagnoses. The overall incidence of SCAD in angiographic series is between 0.28 and 1.1%, with a clear predominance in young, healthy women (70%) of whom approximately 30% are in the postpartum period. In the United Kingdom, between 2008 and 2012, SCAD was the cause of 27% of acute myocardial infarctions during pregnancy, with a prevalence of 1.81 per 100,000 pregnancies. Regarding the mechanism of arterial obstruction, this may be due to the appearance of an intramural hematoma or to a tear in the intima of the arteries, both spontaneously. Although multiple diagnostic methods are available, it is suggested to include an appropriate anamnesis, an electrocardiogram in the first 10 min after admission to the service or the onset of symptoms, and subsequently, a CT angiography of the coronary arteries or urgent coronary angiography if the hemodynamic status of the patient allows it. Treatment should be individualized for each case; however, the appropriate approach is generally based on two fundamental pillars: conservative medical treatment with antiplatelet agents, beta-blockers, and nitrates, and invasive treatment with percutaneous coronary intervention for stent implantation or balloon angioplasty, if necessary.

Indexed as

disease managementpostpartum periodpregnancySCAD

Identifiers

PMID36431134
PMCPMC9692787
OpenAlexW4308873206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.