Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36431133›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Clinical Outcomes of Mid-Urethral Sling (MUS) Procedures for the Treatment of Female Urinary Incontinence: A Multicenter Study.

Karolina Chmaj-Wierzchowska, Grzegorz Raba, Piotr Dykczyński, Maciej Wilczak, Karolina Turlakiewicz, Ilona Latańska, Witold Sujka

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Safety and Effectiveness of G-MeshJournal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Karolina Chmaj-WierzchowskaDepartment of Maternal and Child Health, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Polna 33, 60-535 Poznan, Poland.
Grzegorz RabaClinical Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Rzeszow, Monte Cassino 18, 37-700 Przemysl, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9196-8548
Piotr DykczyńskiDiagnostic and Treatment Center "Barska" Ltd., Barska 13, 87-806 Wloclawek, Poland.
Maciej WilczakDepartment of Maternal and Child Health, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Polna 33, 60-535 Poznan, Poland.
Karolina TurlakiewiczInstitute of Material Science of Textiles and Polymer Composites, Lodz University of Technology, Żeromskiego 116, 90-924 Lodz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6250-092X
Ilona LatańskaTricomed S.A., Swietojanska 5/9, 93-493 Lodz, Poland.
Witold SujkaTricomed S.A., Swietojanska 5/9, 93-493 Lodz, Poland.
Poznan University of Medical Sciences · PLTricomed (Poland) · PLCuiavian University · PLLodz University of Technology · PLUniversity of Rzeszów · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) has a significant impact on the quality of life of many women. Due to embarrassment, most women do not seek medical attention for this condition. The treatment of this problem includes preventive therapies, and in the more advanced stage of urinary incontinence, surgery is a solution. Despite doubts regarding the implantation of urological tapes, the use of tension-free minimally invasive methods constitutes the “gold standard” in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women. Objective: The purpose of this article was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ultralight, polypropylene urogynecological tape (Dallop® NM ULTRALIGHT, Tricomed S.A., Poland) in the surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence and mixed urinary incontinence. Methods: This is a multicenter, retrospective cohort study. The included women were adults with stress urinary incontinence (Grade 2 with a positive cough test or Grade 3) or had mixed urinary incontinence and who had undergone “retropubic” or “transobturator” surgery and completed a postoperative follow-up. Results: The study included 68 women from three hospitals. All women completed <6-month and >6-month follow-ups. The median age was 55 (range 36−80). The average value of BMI in the “retropubic” group was 28.6 ± 5.58, and in the “transobturator” group, it was 26.1 ± 4.60. Sixty-three percent (63%, n = 43) of patients were operated on using the “transobturator” method, while thirty-seven percent (37%, n = 25) were operated on using the “retropubic” method. Both the “retropubic” and “transobturator” groups had comparable results in the treatment of SUI. The study showed efficiencies of 84% for the “transobturator” method and 80% for the “retropubic” method. In the “retropubic” group, intraoperative complications were reported in three patients (7%), in comparison to none in the “transobturator” group. There were no tape-related adverse events or infections reported in any case. Conclusions: The presented research confirms the safety and efficacy of retropubic and transobturator tape methods in both short- and long-term follow-up—the success rate was over 80%. In addition to the surgical method used, the experience of the surgeons also has an impact on the final outcome of the surgery. The conducted multi-center study offers the opportunity to eliminate the influence of the human factor on the effectiveness of the procedure.

Indexed as

efficacymid-urethral slingMUSsafetystress urinary incontinence

Identifiers

PMID36431133
PMCPMC9695694
OpenAlexW4308866970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.