Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36431101›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2022

Point-of-Care Virtual Surgical Planning and 3D Printing in Oral and Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery: A Narrative Review.

Daniel Ostaș, Oana Almășan, Robert R Ileșan, Vlad Andrei, Florian M Thieringer, Mihaela Hedeșiu, Horațiu Rotar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Artificial Intelligence in Dentistry: A Narrative Review of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Applications.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Circular economy and 3D printing in the healthcare sector.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Rapid-printed Three-dimensional Models for Craniomaxillofacial Trauma.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Daniel OstașDepartment of Oral and Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, "Iuliu Hațieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 33 Moților Street, 400001 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-0493-6688
Oana AlmășanDepartment of Prosthetic Dentistry and Dental Materials, "Iuliu Hațieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 32 Clinicilor Street, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-8800-4935
Robert R IleșanDepartment of Oral and Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Basel, 21 Spitalstrasse, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.
Vlad AndreiDepartment of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Dentistry, "Iuliu Hațieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 15 Victor Babes Street, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Florian M ThieringerDepartment of Oral and Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Basel, 21 Spitalstrasse, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3035-9308
Mihaela HedeșiuDepartment of Maxillofacial Surgery and Implantology, "Iuliu Hațieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 37 Cardinal Iuliu Hossu, 400029 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Horațiu RotarDepartment of Oral and Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, "Iuliu Hațieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 33 Moților Street, 400001 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-2138-3322

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper provides an overview on the use of virtual surgical planning (VSP) and point-of-care 3D printing (POC 3DP) in oral and cranio-maxillofacial (CMF) surgery based on a literature review. The authors searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase to find papers published between January 2015 and February 2022 in English, which describe human applications of POC 3DP in CMF surgery, resulting in 63 articles being included. The main review findings were as follows: most used clinical applications were anatomical models and cutting guides; production took place in-house or as "in-house-outsourced" workflows; the surgeon alone was involved in POC 3DP in 36 papers; the use of free versus paid planning software was balanced (50.72% vs. 49.27%); average planning time was 4.44 h; overall operating time decreased and outcomes were favorable, though evidence-based studies were limited; and finally, the heterogenous cost reports made a comprehensive financial analysis difficult. Overall, the development of in-house 3D printed devices supports CMF surgery, and encouraging results indicate that the technology has matured considerably.

Indexed as

3D printingadditive manufacturingcranial surgeryhospital-based printingin-house 3D printingmaxillofacial surgerypoint-of-carevirtual surgical planning

Identifiers

PMID36431101
PMCPMC9692897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.