Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36431029›Full record

ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Artificial Intelligence as an Aid in CBCT Airway Analysis: A Systematic Review.

Ioannis A Tsolakis, Olga-Elpis Kolokitha, Erofili Papadopoulou, Apostolos I Tsolakis, Evangelos G Kilipiris, J Martin Palomo

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ioannis A TsolakisDepartment of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-5435-4889
Olga-Elpis KolokithaDepartment of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-0351-1266
Erofili PapadopoulouDepartment of Oral Medicine & Pathology and Hospital Dentistry, School of Dentistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 10679 Athens, Greece.
Apostolos I TsolakisDepartment of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 10679 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-3019-5438
Evangelos G KilipirisDepartment of Maxillofacial Surgery, F.D. Roosevelt University Hospital, 97517 Banska Bystrica, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0001-6107-8790
J Martin PalomoDepartment of Orthodontics, Case Western Reserve University School of Dental Medicine, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9874-2595
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki · GRNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRUniversity School · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of artificial intelligence (AI) in health sciences is becoming increasingly popular among doctors nowadays. This study evaluated the literature regarding the use of AI for CBCT airway analysis. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review that examines the performance of artificial intelligence in CBCT airway analysis.

methodsElectronic databases and the reference lists of the relevant research papers were searched for published and unpublished literature. Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias evaluation were all carried out independently and twice. Finally, five articles were chosen.

resultsThe results suggested a high correlation between the automatic and manual airway measurements indicating that the airway measurements may be automatically and accurately calculated from CBCT images.

conclusionsAccording to the present literature, automatic airway segmentation can be used for clinical purposes. The main key findings of this systematic review are that the automatic airway segmentation is accurate in the measurement of the airway and, at the same time, appears to be fast and easy to use. However, the present literature is really limited, and more studies in the future providing high-quality evidence are needed.

Indexed as

airwayArtificial IntelligenceCBCT

Identifiers

PMID36431029
PMCPMC9696726
OpenAlexW4309310001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.