Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36431012›Full record

ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Deep Learning Algorithms in the Automatic Segmentation of Liver Lesions in Ultrasound Investigations.

Mădălin Mămuleanu, Cristiana Marinela Urhuț, Larisa Daniela Săndulescu, Constantin Kamal, Ana-Maria Pătrașcu, Alin Gabriel Ionescu, Mircea-Sebastian Șerbănescu, Costin Teodor Streba

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Reliable deep learning for coronary artery disease detection: a patient-level, statistically validated MRI study.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mădălin MămuleanuDepartment of Automatic Control and Electronics, University of Craiova, 200585 Craiova, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-1524-2494
Cristiana Marinela UrhuțDepartment of Gastroenterology, Emergency County Hospital of Craiova, 200642 Craiova, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-5353-4327
Larisa Daniela SăndulescuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Research Center of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania.
Constantin KamalOncometrics S.R.L., 200677 Craiova, Romania.
Ana-Maria PătrașcuOncometrics S.R.L., 200677 Craiova, Romania.
Alin Gabriel IonescuOncometrics S.R.L., 200677 Craiova, Romania.
Mircea-Sebastian ȘerbănescuOncometrics S.R.L., 200677 Craiova, Romania.
Costin Teodor StrebaOncometrics S.R.L., 200677 Craiova, Romania.

Funding

MYSMIS ID 109722 within the National Competitivity Program: POC/62/1/3 Innovative expert computer network-based system neuronal for classification and prognosis of liver tumors
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe ultrasound is one of the most used medical imaging investigations worldwide. It is non-invasive and effective in assessing liver tumors or other types of parenchymal changes.

methodsThe aim of the study was to build a deep learning model for image segmentation in ultrasound video investigations. The dataset used in the study was provided by the University of Medicine and Pharmacy Craiova, Romania and contained 50 video examinations from 49 patients. The mean age of the patients in the cohort was 69.57. Regarding presence of a subjacent liver disease, 36.73% had liver cirrhosis and 16.32% had chronic viral hepatitis (5 patients: chronic hepatitis C and 3 patients: chronic hepatitis B). Frames were extracted and cropped from each examination and an expert gastroenterologist labelled the lesions in each frame. After labelling, the labels were exported as binary images. A deep learning segmentation model (U-Net) was trained with focal Tversky loss as a loss function. Two models were obtained with two different sets of parameters for the loss function. The performance metrics observed were intersection over union and recall and precision.

resultsAnalyzing the intersection over union metric, the first segmentation model obtained performed better compared to the second model: 0.8392 (model 1) vs. 0.7990 (model 2). The inference time for both models was between 32.15 milliseconds and 77.59 milliseconds.

conclusionsTwo segmentation models were obtained in the study. The models performed similarly during training and validation. However, one model was trained to focus on hard-to-predict labels. The proposed segmentation models can represent a first step in automatically extracting time-intensity curves from CEUS examinations.

Indexed as

hepatocarcinomaimage segmentationliver tumorultrasound

Identifiers

PMID36431012
PMCPMC9695234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.