Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36430988›Full record

ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Bioactivity Potential of Bioceramic-Based Root Canal Sealers: A Scoping Review.

Mauro Schmitz Estivalet, Lucas Peixoto de Araújo, Felipe Immich, Adriana Fernandes da Silva, Nadia de Souza Ferreira, Wellington Luiz de Oliveira da Rosa, Evandro Piva

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Evaluation of the apical sealing of an eggshell hydroxyapatite-based sealer.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mauro Schmitz EstivaletProgram in Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Pelotas (UFPEL), Pelotas 96010-610, RS, Brazil.
Lucas Peixoto de AraújoDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Division of Endodontics, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Piracicaba 13083-970, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2893-1416
Felipe ImmichProgram in Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Pelotas (UFPEL), Pelotas 96010-610, RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2478-4861
Adriana Fernandes da SilvaProgram in Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Pelotas (UFPEL), Pelotas 96010-610, RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3942-7138
Nadia de Souza FerreiraProgram in Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Pelotas (UFPEL), Pelotas 96010-610, RS, Brazil.
Wellington Luiz de Oliveira da RosaProgram in Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Pelotas (UFPEL), Pelotas 96010-610, RS, Brazil.
Evandro PivaProgram in Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Pelotas (UFPEL), Pelotas 96010-610, RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5970-5158
Universidade Federal de Pelotas · BRUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBioceramic-based root canal sealers are novel materials with a bioactivity potential that stands out compared with conventional root canal sealers. However, the term bioactivity may be overused and is often misunderstood. Hence, the objective of this study was to synthesize and map key concepts related to the bioactivity analysis of bioceramic-based root canal sealers.

methodsThe present scoping review is reported in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR Statement and is registered in the Open Science Framework. Two blinded reviewers carried out a comprehensive search in six databases up to January 10th, 2022: MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Lilacs/BBO. Eligibility was considered for in vitro and in vivo studies that evaluated the bioactivity potential of bioceramic-based root canal sealers.

resultsA total of 53 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis. In vitro bioactivity was evaluated through the mineralization potential, formation of carbonated apatite on the surface, and the gene expression related to proteins involved in the mineralization process. Meanwhile, for in vivo studies, staining techniques associated with immunohistochemical tests were mainly used to detect mineralization on the material-host tissue interface.

conclusionsAccording to the methodology used, the most prevalent methods to assess bioactivity in acellular form were the immersion of the material in Hank's balanced salt solution, followed by surface observation with scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray. In cell cultures, the chosen method was usually Alizarin Red staining, followed by the evaluation of alkaline phosphatase enzymatic activity and the use of molecular biology tests.

Indexed as

bioactivitybioceramicscalcium-silicateendodonticsroot canal sealerscoping review

Identifiers

PMID36430988
PMCPMC9697500
OpenAlexW4309007943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.