Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36430631›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Hierarchical Voting-Based Feature Selection and Ensemble Learning Model Scheme for Glioma Grading with Clinical and Molecular Characteristics.

Erdal Tasci, Ying Zhuge, Harpreet Kaur, Kevin Camphausen, Andra Valentina Krauze

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Erdal TasciRadiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Building 10, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6754-2187
Ying ZhugeRadiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Building 10, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Harpreet KaurRadiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Building 10, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0421-8341
Kevin CamphausenRadiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Building 10, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Andra Valentina KrauzeRadiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Building 10, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1634-6877

Funding

Radiation Oncology Branch - Radiation ClinicZIDBC010990 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI CAMPHAUSEN, KEVIN · 2009 to 2025
$136.0M
Intramural NIH HHS ZID BC010990NCI NIH HHS ZID BC 010990
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Determining the aggressiveness of gliomas, termed grading, is a critical step toward treatment optimization to increase the survival rate and decrease treatment toxicity for patients. Streamlined grading using molecular information has the potential to facilitate decision making in the clinic and aid in treatment planning. In recent years, molecular markers have increasingly gained importance in the classification of tumors. In this study, we propose a novel hierarchical voting-based methodology for improving the performance results of the feature selection stage and machine learning models for glioma grading with clinical and molecular predictors. To identify the best scheme for the given soft-voting-based ensemble learning model selections, we utilized publicly available TCGA and CGGA datasets and employed four dimensionality reduction methods to carry out a voting-based ensemble feature selection and five supervised models, with a total of sixteen combination sets. We also compared our proposed feature selection method with the LASSO feature selection method in isolation. The computational results indicate that the proposed method achieves 87.606% and 79.668% accuracy rates on TCGA and CGGA datasets, respectively, outperforming the LASSO feature selection method.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsGliomaHumansMachine Learningbrain tumordiagnosticfeature selectiongliomagradingmachine learningmolecular dataoncologypattern recognition

Identifiers

PMID36430631
PMCPMC9697273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.