Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36430432›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Alzheimer's Disease: Treatment Strategies and Their Limitations.

Elodie Passeri, Kamil Elkhoury, Margaretha Morsink, Kerensa Broersen, Michel Linder, Ali Tamayol, Catherine Malaplate, Frances T Yen, Elmira Arab-Tehrany

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 292 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
292citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

292 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Anatomy of a Setback: A Taxonomy of Clinical Trial Failures in Alzheimer's Disease and Strategic Lessons for the Future.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

232 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Elodie PasseriLIBio Laboratory, University of Lorraine, 54505 Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2908-2359
Kamil ElkhouryLIBio Laboratory, University of Lorraine, 54505 Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8160-9333
Margaretha MorsinkDepartment of Applied Stem Cell Technologies, TechMed Centre, University of Twente, 7500AE Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5511-6105
Kerensa BroersenDepartment of Applied Stem Cell Technologies, TechMed Centre, University of Twente, 7500AE Enschede, The Netherlands.
Michel LinderLIBio Laboratory, University of Lorraine, 54505 Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8658-6828
Ali TamayolDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT 06030, USA.
Catherine MalaplateUR AFPA Laboratory, Qualivie Team, University of Lorraine, 54505 Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Frances T YenUR AFPA Laboratory, Qualivie Team, University of Lorraine, 54505 Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8740-4304
Elmira Arab-TehranyLIBio Laboratory, University of Lorraine, 54505 Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most frequent case of neurodegenerative disease and is becoming a major public health problem all over the world. Many therapeutic strategies have been explored for several decades; however, there is still no curative treatment, and the priority remains prevention. In this review, we present an update on the clinical and physiological phase of the AD spectrum, modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors for AD treatment with a focus on prevention strategies, then research models used in AD, followed by a discussion of treatment limitations. The prevention methods can significantly slow AD evolution and are currently the best strategy possible before the advanced stages of the disease. Indeed, current drug treatments have only symptomatic effects, and disease-modifying treatments are not yet available. Drug delivery to the central nervous system remains a complex process and represents a challenge for developing therapeutic and preventive strategies. Studies are underway to test new techniques to facilitate the bioavailability of molecules to the brain. After a deep study of the literature, we find the use of soft nanoparticles, in particular nanoliposomes and exosomes, as an innovative approach for preventive and therapeutic strategies in reducing the risk of AD and solving problems of brain bioavailability. Studies show the promising role of nanoliposomes and exosomes as smart drug delivery systems able to penetrate the blood-brain barrier and target brain tissues. Finally, the different drug administration techniques for neurological disorders are discussed. One of the promising therapeutic methods is the intranasal administration strategy which should be used for preclinical and clinical studies of neurodegenerative diseases.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseNanoparticlesNeurodegenerative DiseasesBlood-Brain BarrierDrug Delivery SystemsHumansAlzheimer’s diseaseblood–brain-barrierexosomesintranasal administrationliposomespolyunsaturated fatty acidstherapeutics strategies

Identifiers

PMID36430432
PMCPMC9697769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.