Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36430395›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

DRPreter: Interpretable Anticancer Drug Response Prediction Using Knowledge-Guided Graph Neural Networks and Transformer.

Jihye Shin, Yinhua Piao, Dongmin Bang, Sun Kim, Kyuri Jo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Machine Learning-Enabled Drug-Induced Toxicity Prediction.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  14. Pathway-guided architectures for interpretable AI in biological research.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jihye ShinInterdisciplinary Program in Bioinformatics, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8593-0607
Yinhua PiaoDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Institute of Engineering Research, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5506-8158
Dongmin BangInterdisciplinary Program in Bioinformatics, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9217-8380
Sun KimInterdisciplinary Program in Bioinformatics, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5385-9546
Kyuri JoDepartment of Computer Engineering, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9222-6346
Seoul National University · KRChungbuk National University · KR

Funding

Bio Medical Technology Development Program of the National Research Foundation (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science ICT NRF-2022M3E5F3085677Collaborative Genome Program for Fostering New Post Genome Industry of the National Research Foundation (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT) NRF2014M3C9A3063541Institute of Information communications Technology Planning Evaluation (IITP) grant funded by the Korea government(MSIT) NO.2021-0-01343, Artificial Intelligence Graduate School Program (Seoul National University)Ministry of food and Drug Safety No. DY0002259501National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF) grant funded by the Korea government(MSIT) No. NRF-2020R1G1A1003558
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Some of the recent studies on drug sensitivity prediction have applied graph neural networks to leverage prior knowledge on the drug structure or gene network, and other studies have focused on the interpretability of the model to delineate the mechanism governing the drug response. However, it is crucial to make a prediction model that is both knowledge-guided and interpretable, so that the prediction accuracy is improved and practical use of the model can be enhanced. We propose an interpretable model called DRPreter (drug response predictor and interpreter) that predicts the anticancer drug response. DRPreter learns cell line and drug information with graph neural networks; the cell-line graph is further divided into multiple subgraphs with domain knowledge on biological pathways. A type-aware transformer in DRPreter helps detect relationships between pathways and a drug, highlighting important pathways that are involved in the drug response. Extensive experiments on the GDSC (Genomics of Drug Sensitivity and Cancer) dataset demonstrate that the proposed method outperforms state-of-the-art graph-based models for drug response prediction. In addition, DRPreter detected putative key genes and pathways for specific drug-cell-line pairs with supporting evidence in the literature, implying that our model can help interpret the mechanism of action of the drug.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsElectric Power SuppliesDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorLearningNeural Networks, ComputerAntineoplastic Agentsartificial intelligencecancerdrug discoverydrug sensitivityExplainable AIgraph neural networkshuman healthpharmacogenomicsprecision medicinetranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID36430395
PMCPMC9699175
OpenAlexW4309009637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.