Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36430331›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Advanced Sperm Selection Strategies as a Treatment for Infertile Couples: A Systematic Review.

Jordi Ribas-Maynou, Isabel Barranco, Maria Sorolla-Segura, Marc Llavanera, Ariadna Delgado-Bermúdez, Marc Yeste

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Genetic and Epigenetic Risks of Male Infertility in ART.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  3. Sperm selection for assisted reproductive technology: do we have a winner?Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jordi Ribas-MaynouUnit of Cell Biology, Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Girona, 17003 Girona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9101-2044
Isabel BarrancoDepartment of Veterinary Medical Sciences, University of Bologna, Ozzano dell'Emilia, 40126 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9873-814X
Maria Sorolla-SeguraUnit of Cell Biology, Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Girona, 17003 Girona, Spain.
Marc LlavaneraUnit of Cell Biology, Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Girona, 17003 Girona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0685-7534
Ariadna Delgado-BermúdezUnit of Cell Biology, Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Girona, 17003 Girona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5655-5003
Marc YesteUnit of Cell Biology, Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Girona, 17003 Girona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2209-340X
Universitat de Girona · ESInstitució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats · ESUniversity of Bologna · IT

Funding

European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme 801342 (Grant: TECSPR-19-1-0003)European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme H2020-MSCA-IF-2019-891382La Marató de TV3 Foundation 214/857-202039Regional Government of Catalonia, Spain 2017-SGR-1229
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assisted reproductive technology (ART) is an essential tool to overcome infertility, and is a worldwide disease that affects millions of couples at reproductive age. Sperm selection is a crucial step in ART treatment, as it ensures the use of the highest quality sperm for fertilization, thus increasing the chances of a positive outcome. In recent years, advanced sperm selection strategies for ART have been developed with the aim of mimicking the physiological sperm selection that occurs in the female genital tract. This systematic review sought to evaluate whether advanced sperm selection techniques could improve ART outcomes and sperm quality/functionality parameters compared to traditional sperm selection methods (swim-up or density gradients) in infertile couples. According to preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA guidelines), the inclusion and exclusion criteria were defined in a PICOS (population, intervention, comparator, outcome, study) table. A systematic search of the available literature published in MEDLINE-PubMed until December 2021 was subsequently conducted. Although 4237 articles were recorded after an initial search, only 47 studies were finally included. Most reports (30/47; 63.8%) revealed an improvement in ART outcomes after conducting advanced vs. traditional sperm selection methods. Among those that also assessed sperm quality/functionality parameters (12/47), there was a consensus (10/12; 83.3%) about the beneficial effect of advanced sperm selection methods on these variables. In conclusion, the application of advanced sperm selection methods improves ART outcomes. In spite of this, as no differences in the reproductive efficiency between advanced methods has been reported, none can be pointed out as a gold standard to be conducted routinely. Further research addressing whether the efficiency of each method relies on the etiology of infertility is warranted.

Indexed as

InfertilitySemenFemaleHumansMaleReproductionReproductive Techniques, AssistedSpermatozoafertilityICSIinfertilityIVFsperm qualitysperm selection techniques

Identifiers

PMID36430331
PMCPMC9695162
OpenAlexW4308877642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.