SynthesisInternational journal of molecular sciences2022
Advanced Sperm Selection Strategies as a Treatment for Infertile Couples: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- The potential, perils and pitfalls of Artificial intelligence (AI) in Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART).Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2026Review
- Genetic and Epigenetic Risks of Male Infertility in ART.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Sperm selection for assisted reproductive technology: do we have a winner?Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Review
- A Narrative Review on the Sperm Selection Methods in Assisted Reproductive Technology: Out with the New, the Old Is Better?Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- The Association Between Sleep Disorder and Female Infertility: A Mediation Analysis of Inflammatory and Oxidative Markers.Mediators of inflammation · 2025Article
- A narrative review of sperm selection technology for assisted reproduction techniques.Translational andrology and urology · 2024Review
- Advanced Sperm Selection Techniques for Assisted Reproduction.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
- Emerging trends in sperm selection: enhancing success rates in assisted reproduction.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2024Review
- Sperm Preparation with Microfluidic Sperm Sorting Chip May Improve Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Outcomes Compared to Density Gradient Centrifugation.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2024Article
- Spermbots and Their Applications in Assisted Reproduction: Current Progress and Future Perspectives.International journal of nanomedicine · 2024Review
- Efficacy of Various Sperm Selection Strategies in Obtaining Sperm with Improved DNA Integrity: A Prospective Study.American journal of men's healthArticle
- Commentary Letter to the Editor Regarding Impact of Intrauterine Infusion of Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma on Assisted Reproductive Outcomes in Patients With Recurrent Implantation Failure: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Reproductive medicine and biologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Assisted reproductive technology (ART) is an essential tool to overcome infertility, and is a worldwide disease that affects millions of couples at reproductive age. Sperm selection is a crucial step in ART treatment, as it ensures the use of the highest quality sperm for fertilization, thus increasing the chances of a positive outcome. In recent years, advanced sperm selection strategies for ART have been developed with the aim of mimicking the physiological sperm selection that occurs in the female genital tract. This systematic review sought to evaluate whether advanced sperm selection techniques could improve ART outcomes and sperm quality/functionality parameters compared to traditional sperm selection methods (swim-up or density gradients) in infertile couples. According to preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA guidelines), the inclusion and exclusion criteria were defined in a PICOS (population, intervention, comparator, outcome, study) table. A systematic search of the available literature published in MEDLINE-PubMed until December 2021 was subsequently conducted. Although 4237 articles were recorded after an initial search, only 47 studies were finally included. Most reports (30/47; 63.8%) revealed an improvement in ART outcomes after conducting advanced vs. traditional sperm selection methods. Among those that also assessed sperm quality/functionality parameters (12/47), there was a consensus (10/12; 83.3%) about the beneficial effect of advanced sperm selection methods on these variables. In conclusion, the application of advanced sperm selection methods improves ART outcomes. In spite of this, as no differences in the reproductive efficiency between advanced methods has been reported, none can be pointed out as a gold standard to be conducted routinely. Further research addressing whether the efficiency of each method relies on the etiology of infertility is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.