Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36430047›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Has the COVID-19 Pandemic Led to Changes in the Tasks of the Primary Care Workforce? An International Survey among General Practices in 38 Countries (PRICOV-19).

Peter Groenewegen, Esther Van Poel, Peter Spreeuwenberg, Ronald Batenburg, Christian Mallen, Liubove Murauskiene, Antoni Peris, Benoit Pétré, Emmily Schaubroeck, Stefanie Stark and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
17.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Peter GroenewegenNetherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), 3500 BN Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Esther Van PoelDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-8470-9214
Peter SpreeuwenbergNetherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), 3500 BN Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Ronald BatenburgNetherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), 3500 BN Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9453-481X
Christian MallenSchool of Medicine, Keele University, Keele ST5 5BG, UK.
Liubove MurauskieneDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Vilnius, 03101 Vilnius, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0002-6625-8843
Antoni PerisCastelldefels Agents de Salut (Casap), 08860 Castelldefels, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1059-2738
Benoit PétréDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium.
Emmily SchaubroeckInstitute of General Practice, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlan-gen-Nürnberg, Germany.
Stefanie StarkInstitute of General Practice, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlan-gen-Nürnberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5349-7984
Emil L SigurdssonDepartment of family medicine, University of Iceland, 102 Reykjavík, Iceland.
Athina TatsioniResearch Unit for General Medicine and Primary Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, 45110 Ioannina, Greece.
Kyriaki VafeidouResearch Unit for General Medicine and Primary Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, 45110 Ioannina, Greece.
Sara WillemsDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-6349-7785
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEGhent University · BEKeele University · GBNetherlands Institute for Health Services Research · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity of Iceland · ISUniversity of Liège · BEUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a large and varying impact on primary care. This paper studies changes in the tasks of general practitioners (GPs) and associated staff during the COVID-19 pandemic. Data from the PRICOV-19 study of 5093 GPs in 38 countries were used. We constructed a scale for task changes and performed multilevel analyses. The scale was reliable at both GP and country level. Clustering of task changes at country level was considerable (25%). During the pandemic, staff members were more involved in giving information and recommendations to patients contacting the practice by phone, and they were more involved in triage. GPs took on additional responsibilities and were more involved in reaching out to patients. Problems due to staff absence, when dealt with internally, were related to more task changes. Task changes were larger in practices employing a wider range of professional groups. Whilst GPs were happy with the task changes in practices with more changes, they also felt the need for further training. A higher-than-average proportion of elderly people and people with a chronic condition in the practice were related to task changes. The number of infections in a country during the first wave of the pandemic was related to task changes. Other characteristics at country level were not associated with task changes. Future research on the sustainability of task changes after the pandemic is needed.

Indexed as

COVID-19General PracticeAgedHumansPandemicsPrimary Health CareWorkforceCOVID-19general practicegeneral practitionersinternational comparisonPRICOV-19primary care workforceprimary health carequality of caretask changes

Identifiers

PMID36430047
PMCPMC9690243
OpenAlexW4309787074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.