Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36430040›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Development of the Korean Medicine Core Outcome Set for Primary Dysmenorrhea (COS-PD-KM) for Herbal Medicine Treatment of Primary Dysmenorrhea in Primary Clinics.

Pyung-Wha Kim, Sungha Kim, Dong-Il Kim, Jiyun Cha, He-Sol Lee, Mi Mi Ko, Soobin Jang, Changsop Yang, Myeong Soo Lee

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Pyung-Wha KimR&D Strategy Division, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine, Daejeon 34054, Republic of Korea.
Sungha KimKM Science Research Division, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine, Daejeon 34054, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5542-3850
Dong-Il KimDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, College of Korean Medicine, Dongguk University, Goyang 10326, Republic of Korea.
Jiyun ChaDigital Health Research Division, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine, Daejeon 34054, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0387-6142
He-Sol LeeR&D Strategy Division, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine, Daejeon 34054, Republic of Korea.
Mi Mi KoKM Science Research Division, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine, Daejeon 34054, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5758-4655
Soobin JangDepartment of Preventive Medicine, College of Korean Medicine, Daegu Haany University, Gyeongsan 38610, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0943-9290
Changsop YangKM Science Research Division, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine, Daejeon 34054, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1277-3329
Myeong Soo LeeKM Science Research Division, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine, Daejeon 34054, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-6651-7641

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to develop a Korean medicine (KM) core outcome set (COS) for primary dysmenorrhea to evaluate the effectiveness of herbal medicine (HM) in treating primary dysmenorrhea in patients visiting KM primary clinics. Previously reported outcomes were identified through a literature review to define outcomes and effect modifiers (EMs) for the questionnaire. Experts were invited to conduct modified Delphi consensus exercises, and primary care clinicians were invited to conduct Delphi consensus exercises to evaluate suitability and feasibility. Finally, an additional round of a modified Delphi exercise was conducted with experts to obtain a final agreement on the COS. Seventeen outcomes and 15 EMs were included from a literature review, and one effect modifier was suggested by the experts (Phase 1). In Phase 2, after the modified Delphi consensus exercises by experts, 10 outcomes and 11 EMs were included in the COS. The clinicians all agreed on the feasibility of COS (Phase 3). Finally, 10 outcomes and 6 EMs were included in the COS-PD-KM after the final modified Delphi consensus exercise (Phase 4). The effectiveness of HM used in primary clinics could be evaluated with this COS in patients with primary dysmenorrhea. Further studies that involve more relevant stakeholder groups, such as patient representatives and gynecological experts, are needed.

Indexed as

Herbal MedicinePlants, MedicinalDelphi TechniqueDysmenorrheaFemaleHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CareRepublic of KoreaResearch Designcore outcome setherbal medicineKorean medicineprimary careprimary dysmenorrhea

Identifiers

PMID36430040
PMCPMC9690837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.