Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36429968›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Tobacco Whack-A-Mole: A Consumption Taxonomy of Cigar & Other Combustible Tobacco Products among a Nationally Representative Sample of Young Adults.

Kymberle Landrum Sterling, Katherine Masyn, Stephanie Pike Moore, Craig S Fryer, Erika Trapl, Ce Shang, Douglas Gunzler

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Patterns of Blunt and Cigar Use in the United States, 2015-2019.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Kymberle Landrum SterlingDepartment of Health Promotion & Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Sciences Center, Dallas, TX 75207, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6305-5082
Katherine MasynDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30302, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5337-1137
Stephanie Pike MooreDepartment of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6301-9185
Craig S FryerDepartment of Behavioral and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1125-3578
Erika TraplDepartment of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5021-8505
Ce ShangDepartment of Internal Medicine, Wexner Medical Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8838-4250
Douglas GunzlerDepartment of Medicine, The MetroHealth System, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Case Western Reserve University · USGeorgia State University · USMetroHealth Medical Center · USThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · USUniversity of Maryland, College Park · USUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at Dallas · US

Funding

Implied Modified Risk Statements as Predictors of Flavored Little Cigar and Cigarillo UseR01CA228906 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI STERLING, KYMBERLE L · 2018 to 2020
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA228906
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLittle filtered cigars and cigarillos (LCCs) are consumed infrequently, co-administered with marijuana, and concurrently used with other tobacco products. Reliance on the past 30-day use estimate, a marker of tobacco user status, may underestimate the dynamic nature of intermittent LCC and other tobacco product use. We developed a framework to capture the intermittent nature of exclusive LCC use and dual/poly use with cigarettes and large cigars using broader timing of last product use categories and product use modality (e.g., with marijuana).

methodsData come from the baseline C'RILLOS study, a U.S. nationally representative sample of young adults aged 18-34 (

resultsSeventy-five percent of our sample reported ever use of any combustible tobacco product, including LCCs. The most common ever use pattern was poly use of LCC-T + LCC-B + cigarettes (16%). Our consumption taxonomy framework demonstrated the fluid nature of combustible tobacco product use among LCC users. For instance, among past 30-day cigarette users, 48% reported using LCC-T, 39% reported using LCC-B, and 32% reported using large cigars in the past 3 months or more. DISCUSSION: The tobacco use field currently classifies 'tobacco users' based on the product they smoked in the past 30 days. Any tobacco product use beyond the past 30-day period is considered 'discontinued use' and not the focus of intervention or tobacco regulatory science decisions. We documented the substantial proportion of young adult LCC, cigarette, and large cigar users who either exclusively or dual/poly used these combustible products in recent (e.g., past 3 months) periods. To prevent underestimation of use, surveillance measures should assess the use modality, timing of last product use, and exclusive/multiple product use to more accurately identify the smoking status of young adult LCC users.

Indexed as

CannabisTobacco ProductsTobacco Use DisorderHumansSmokingTobacco UseYoung Adultcigarettecigarillolarge cigarlittle filtered cigartobacco useyoung adults

Identifiers

PMID36429968
PMCPMC9690741
OpenAlexW4309459000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.