Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36429958›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Evaluation of the Second Premolar's Bud Position Using Computer Image Analysis and Neural Modelling Methods.

Katarzyna Cieślińska, Katarzyna Zaborowicz, Maciej Zaborowicz, Barbara Biedziak

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Automated Cephalometric Points Marking System.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Artificial intelligence in forensic medicine and forensic dentistry.The Journal of forensic odonto-stomatology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Katarzyna CieślińskaDepartment of Orthodontics and Facial Abnormalities, University of Medical Sciences in Poznan, Colegium Maius, Fredry 10, 61-701 Poznan, Poland.
Katarzyna ZaborowiczDepartment of Orthodontics and Facial Abnormalities, University of Medical Sciences in Poznan, Colegium Maius, Fredry 10, 61-701 Poznan, Poland.
Maciej ZaborowiczDepartment of Biosystems Engineering, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 50, 60-627 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-0000-6157
Barbara BiedziakDepartment of Orthodontics and Facial Abnormalities, University of Medical Sciences in Poznan, Colegium Maius, Fredry 10, 61-701 Poznan, Poland.
Poznan University of Medical Sciences · PLUniversity of Life Sciences in Poznań · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Panoramic radiograph is a universally used diagnostic method in dentistry for identifying various dental anomalies and assessing developmental stages of the dentition. The second premolar is the tooth with the highest number of developmental abnormalities. The purpose of this study was to generate neural models for assessing the position of the bud of the second premolar tooth based on analysis of tooth-bone indicators of other teeth. The study material consisted of 300 digital pantomographic radiographs of children in their developmental period. The study group consisted of 165 boys and 135 girls. The study included radiographs of patients of Polish nationality, aged 6-10 years, without diagnosed systemic diseases and local disorders. The study resulted in a set of original indicators to accurately assess the development of the second premolar tooth using computer image analysis and neural modelling. Five neural networks were generated, whose test quality was between 68-91%. The network dedicated to all quadrants of the dentition showed the highest test quality at 91%. The training, validation and test subsets were divided in a standard 2:1;1 ratio into 150 training cases, 75 test cases and 75 validation cases.

Indexed as

ComputersImage Processing, Computer-AssistedBicuspidChildFemaleHumansMaleNeural Networks, ComputerRadiography, Panoramicartificial neural network (ANN)digital radiographs analysisneural modelingpantomographic radiograph (PR)

Identifiers

PMID36429958
PMCPMC9691188
OpenAlexW4309456540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.