ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022
Health Recommender Systems Development, Usage, and Evaluation from 2010 to 2022: A Scoping Review.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tailoring in eHealth lifestyle interventions targeting people with cardiometabolic conditions and lower socioeconomic position: A scoping review.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Features of Virtual Navigation Systems for Health Care and Social Services Associated With Patient Outcomes: Protocol for a Scoping Review.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Why health recommender systems struggle to reach clinical practice: A lifecycle-oriented systematic review.iScience · 2026Article
- Impact of a Prototype Combining Recommender Functionality With Structured Documentation on Operator Performance in Calls to Medical Communication Centers: Quasi-Experimental Feasibility Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Mapping Digital Nudges and Recommender Systems for Obesity Prevention: Scoping Review.Interactive journal of medical research · 2026Review
- Typologies of Symptoms and Functions Among Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease and Population Characteristics: A Latent Profile Analysis.Nursing open · 2026Article
- Impact of coping profiles on social identity in a youth chronic pain recommender system: qualitative descriptive study.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Development of an Evaluation Index System for Health Recommender Systems Based on the Health Technology Assessment Framework: Cross-Sectional Delphi Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Article
- Overcoming Challenges in Video-Based Health Monitoring: Real-World Implementation, Ethics, and Data Considerations.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Recommender systems for obesity prevention: Scoping review of reviews.SAGE open medicine · 2025Review
- We don't need more apps, we need connection: recommender systems as under-explored chance to promote students' mental health at universities.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Development of a recommendation system and data analysis in personalized medicine: an approach towards healthy vascular ageing.Health information science and systems · 2024Article
- Article
- Health recommender systems to facilitate collaborative decision-making in chronic disease management: A scoping review.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A health recommender system (HRS) provides a user with personalized medical information based on the user's health profile. This scoping review aims to identify and summarize the HRS development in the most recent decade by focusing on five key aspects: health domain, user, recommended item, recommendation technology, and system evaluation. We searched PubMed, ACM Digital Library, IEEE Xplore, Web of Science, and Scopus databases for English literature published between 2010 and 2022. Our study selection and data extraction followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. The following are the primary results: sixty-three studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the data analysis. These studies involved twenty-four health domains, with both patients and the general public as target users and ten major recommended items. The most adopted algorithm of recommendation technologies was the knowledge-based approach. In addition, fifty-nine studies reported system evaluations, in which two types of evaluation methods and three categories of metrics were applied. However, despite existing research progress on HRSs, the health domains, recommended items, and sample size of system evaluation have been limited. In the future, HRS research shall focus on dynamic user modelling, utilizing open-source knowledge bases, and evaluating the efficacy of HRSs using a large sample size. In conclusion, this study summarized the research activities and evidence pertinent to HRSs in the most recent ten years and identified gaps in the existing research landscape. Further work shall address the gaps and continue improving the performance of HRSs to empower users in terms of healthcare decision making and self-management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.