Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36429661›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Economic Impact of the Implementation of an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Protocol in a Bariatric Patient Undergoing a Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass.

Alfonso Higueras, Gilberto Gonzalez, Maria de Lourdes Bolaños, Maria Victoria Redondo, Isabel M Olazabal, Jaime Ruiz-Tovar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Adoption of the Polish Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery Care Standards: a nationwide survey.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alfonso HiguerasSchool of Medicine, University Alfonso X, 28691 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8943-6131
Gilberto GonzalezHospital Real San José, Guadalajara 19001, Mexico.
Maria de Lourdes BolañosNeuroscience Institute, Centro Universitario de Ciencias Biológico Agropecuarias (CUCBA), University of Guadalajara, Guadalajara 44600, Mexico.
Maria Victoria RedondoSchool of Medicine, University Alfonso X, 28691 Madrid, Spain.
Isabel M OlazabalSchool of Medicine, University Alfonso X, 28691 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6579-0328
Jaime Ruiz-TovarSchool of Medicine, University Alfonso X, 28691 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8505-2605

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEnhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols have proven to be cost-effective in various surgical procedures, mainly in colorectal surgeries. However, there is still little scientific evidence evaluating the economic impact of their application in bariatric surgery. The present study aimed to compare the economic cost of performing a laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass following an ERAS protocol, with the costs of following a standard-of-care protocol. PATIENTS AND

methodsA prospective non-randomized study of patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass was performed. Patients were divided into two groups: patients following an ERAS protocol and patients following a standard-of-care protocol. The total costs of the procedure were subdivided into pharmacological expenditures, surgical material, and time expenses, the price of complementary tests performed during the hospital stay, and costs related to the hospital stay.

resultsThe 84 patients included 58 women (69%) and 26 men (31%) with a mean age of 44.3 ± 11.6 years. There were no significant differences in age, gender, and distribution of comorbidities between groups. Postoperative pain, nausea or vomiting, and hospital stay were significantly lower within the ERAS group. The pharmacological expenditures, the price of complementary tests performed during the hospital stay, and the costs related to the hospital stay, were significantly lower in the ERAS group. There were no significant differences in the surgical material and surgical time costs between groups. Globally, the total cost of the procedure was significantly lower in the ERAS group with a mean saving of 1458.62$ per patient. The implementation of an ERAS protocol implied a mean saving of 21.25% of the total cost of the procedure.

conclusionsThe implementation of an ERAS protocol significantly reduces the perioperative cost of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Indexed as

Enhanced Recovery After SurgeryGastric BypassObesity, MorbidAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsProspective Studiesbed occupancy costscomplementary test costseconomic analysispharmacological costsRoux-en-Y gastric bypasssurgical material costssurgical time costs

Identifiers

PMID36429661
PMCPMC9690327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.