Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36429651›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Recommender System Based on Collaborative Filtering for Personalized Dietary Advice: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the ELSA-Brasil Study.

Vanderlei Carneiro Silva, Bartira Gorgulho, Dirce Maria Marchioni, Sheila Maria Alvim, Luana Giatti, Tânia Aparecida de Araujo, Angelica Castilho Alonso, Itamar de Souza Santos, Paulo Andrade Lotufo, Isabela Martins Benseñor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Vanderlei Carneiro SilvaDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 01246-904, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1595-1880
Bartira GorgulhoDepartment of Food and Nutrition, School of Nutrition, Federal University of Mato Grosso, Cuiaba 78060-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1714-3548
Dirce Maria MarchioniDepartment of Nutrition, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 01246-904, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6810-5779
Sheila Maria AlvimInstitute of Collective Health, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador 40110-040, Brazil.
Luana GiattiDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine & Clinical Hospital, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte 30130-100, Brazil.
Tânia Aparecida de AraujoDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 01246-904, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5894-8695
Angelica Castilho AlonsoLaboratory of the Study of Movement, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05403-010, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9644-5068
Itamar de Souza SantosCenter of Clinical and Epidemiological Research, University Hospital, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-000, Brazil.
Paulo Andrade LotufoCenter of Clinical and Epidemiological Research, University Hospital, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-000, Brazil.
Isabela Martins BenseñorCenter of Clinical and Epidemiological Research, University Hospital, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6723-5678

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to predict dietary recommendations and compare the performance of algorithms based on collaborative filtering for making predictions of personalized dietary recommendations. We analyzed the baseline cross-sectional data (2008-2010) of 12,667 participants of the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil). The participants were public employees of teaching and research institutions, aged 35-74 years, and 59% female. A semiquantitative Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) was used for dietary assessment. The predictions of dietary recommendations were based on two machine learning (ML) algorithms-user-based collaborative filtering (UBCF) and item-based collaborative filtering (IBCF). The ML algorithms had similar precision (88-91%). The error metrics were lower for UBCF than for IBCF: with a root mean square error (RMSE) of 1.49 vs. 1.67 and a mean square error (MSE) of 2.21 vs. 2.78. Although all food groups were used as input in the system, the items eligible as recommendations included whole cereals, tubers and roots, beans and other legumes, oilseeds, fruits, vegetables, white meats and fish, and low-fat dairy products and milk. The algorithms' performances were similar in making predictions for dietary recommendations. The models presented can provide support for health professionals in interventions that promote healthier habits and improve adherence to this personalized dietary advice.

Indexed as

VegetablesAnimalsBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesDiet SurveysLongitudinal Studiesalgorithmscollaborative filteringdietdietary advicerecommender system

Identifiers

PMID36429651
PMCPMC9690822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.