Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36429637›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Psychometric Properties of the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) Scale in Post-Stroke Patients-Spanish Population.

Jessica Fernández-Solana, Rocío Pardo-Hernández, Jerónimo J González-Bernal, Esteban Sánchez-González, Josefa González-Santos, Raúl Soto-Cámara, Mirian Santamaría-Pelaez

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Italian translation, cultural adaptation, and validation of the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) and the Stroke Upper Limb Capacity Scale (SULCS) for individuals post-stroke.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jessica Fernández-SolanaDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Burgos, 09001 Burgos, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9937-7753
Rocío Pardo-HernándezDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Burgos, 09001 Burgos, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0084-8848
Jerónimo J González-BernalDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Burgos, 09001 Burgos, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7298-9060
Esteban Sánchez-GonzálezDepartement of Medicine, University of Vic, 08500 Barcelona, Spain.
Josefa González-SantosDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Burgos, 09001 Burgos, Spain.
Raúl Soto-CámaraDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Burgos, 09001 Burgos, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9072-0364
Mirian Santamaría-PelaezDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Burgos, 09001 Burgos, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4255-7355
Universidad de Burgos · ESUniversitat de Vic - Universitat Central de Catalunya · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The validation of measuring instruments in the field of health is a requirement before they can be used safely and reliably. The action research arm test (ARAT) tool is an instrument validated in numerous countries and languages and for different populations, and its use is widespread. The objective of this research was to determine the psychometric properties of ARAT for a sample composed of post-stroke patients. To achieve this, a psychometric analysis was performed, where internal consistency tests were carried out using Cronbach's alpha, correlations between items and item-total and half-level tests to verify their reliability. Regarding validity, criteria validity tests were performed, taking the motor function dimension of the Fugl-Meyer scale as gold standard, and convergent validity tests were performed by correlation with the FIM-FAM, ECVI-38 and Lawton and Brody scales. The results showed very good internal consistency as well as good criterion and convergent validity. In conclusion, the ARAT can be considered a valid and reliable instrument for the evaluation of upper limb function in post-stroke patients.

Indexed as

LanguageStrokeHealth Services ResearchHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of Resultsaction research arm testACVfunctionupper limb

Identifiers

PMID36429637
PMCPMC9690867
OpenAlexW4309005556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.