Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36429612›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Conceptual Framework of a Psychotherapeutic Consultation in the Workplace: A Qualitative Study.

Eva Rothermund, Tim Pößnecker, Andreas Antes, Reinhold Kilian, Franziska Kessemeier, Jörn von Wietersheim, Dorothea Mayer, Monika A Rieger, Harald Gündel, Michael Hölzer and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. [Rationale, models, and impact of workplace-based psychotherapeutic services].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Eva RothermundDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Ulm University Medical Center, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081 Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8295-2632
Tim PößneckerDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Ulm University Medical Center, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081 Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7871-4650
Andreas AntesDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Ulm University Medical Center, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Reinhold KilianDepartment of Psychiatry II, Ulm University Medical Center at BKH Günzburg, Lindenallee 2, 89312 Günzburg, Germany.
Franziska KessemeierLeadership Personality Center Ulm (LPCU), Ulm University, Kornhausgasse 9, 89073 Ulm, Germany.
Jörn von WietersheimDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Ulm University Medical Center, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Dorothea MayerHealth and Safety Sindelfingen, Daimler AG, Bela-Barenyi-Straße, 71059 Sindelfingen, Germany.
Monika A RiegerInstitute for Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research, University Clinic Tübingen, Wilhelmstraße 27, 72074 Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7855-3663
Harald GündelDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Ulm University Medical Center, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Michael HölzerLeadership Personality Center Ulm (LPCU), Ulm University, Kornhausgasse 9, 89073 Ulm, Germany.
Elisabeth M BalintDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Ulm University Medical Center, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081 Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4172-2689
Kathrin MörtlFaculty of Psychotherapy Science, Sigmund Freud University, Freudplatz 1, 1020 Vienna, Austria.
Universität Ulm · DEDaimler (Germany) · DESigmund Freud Privatuniversität Wien · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: A new health care offer called 'psychotherapeutic consultation in the workplace' is an early and effective intervention for employees with common mental disorders. Although cost-effective, it lacks a broader roll-out. This might be attributable to undefined context, mechanisms of change, and a lack of communication; therefore, this study explores how the new model works and where problems occur. (2) Methods: Semi-structured interviews on motivation, expectations and experiences with 20 involved experts. Experts were members of the company health promotion team, service users, and cooperating mental health specialists. Analysis was conducted with ATLAS.ti. (3) Results: The conceptual framework comprises three main topics: (a) structured implementation concept; (b) persons involved, shaping the concept's processes; (c) and meaning and function of the offer within the given context. Concerning (c) we found three potential areas of conflict: (1) intra-corporate conflicts, (2) conflicts between company and employee, (3) and conflicts between the company health promotion and the health care system. Category (c) comprises the offer's core characteristics which were described as low-threshold and preventive. Furthermore, the offer was perceived as convenient in handling, confidential, and having immediate impact on a person's well-being. (4) Conclusions: Here we define structures, address the needs of the involved persons, and communicate foreseeable areas of conflict influences whether the implementation of the intervention succeeds.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersReferral and ConsultationHealth PromotionHumansQualitative ResearchWorkplacecompany health promotioncomplex interventiondepressionearly interventiongrounded theory methodologyhealth services researchmental health

Identifiers

PMID36429612
PMCPMC9690206
OpenAlexW4308971965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.