Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36429538›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Healthcare Equity and Commissioning: A Four-Year National Analysis of Portuguese Primary Healthcare Units.

António Pereira, André Biscaia, Isis Calado, Alberto Freitas, Andreia Costa, Anabela Coelho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

António PereiraFamily Health Unit, Unidade de Saúde Familiar Prelada, ACES Porto Ocidental, 4250-113 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-8290-5297
André BiscaiaCINTESIS-Center for Health Technology and Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-5677-1539
Isis CaladoUniversity College London Medical School, London WC1E 6DE, UK.
Alberto FreitasCINTESIS-Center for Health Technology and Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-2113-9653
Andreia CostaNursing Research, Innovation and Development Centre of Lisbon (CIDNUR), Nursing School of Lisbon (ESEL), 1600-096 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-2727-4402
Anabela CoelhoComprehensive Health Research Centre (CHRC), Nursing Department, University of Évora, 7004-516 Evora, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Equal and adequate access to healthcare is one of the pillars of Portuguese health policy. Despite the controversy over commissioning processes' contribution to equity in health, this article aims to clarify the relationship between socio-economic factors and the results of primary healthcare (PHC) commissioning indicators through an analysis of four years of data from all PHC units in Portugal. The factor that presents a statistically significant relationship with a greater number of indicators is the organizational model. Since the reform of PHC services in 2005, a new type of unit was introduced: the family health unit (USF). At the time of the study, these units covered 58.1% of the population and achieved better indicator results. In most cases, the evolution of the results achieved by commissioning seems to be similar in different analyzed contexts. Nevertheless, the percentage of patients of a non-Portuguese nationality and the population density were analyzed, and a widening of discrepancies was observed in 23.3% of the cases. The commissioning indicators were statistically related to the studied context factors, and some of these, such as the nurse home visits indicator, are more sensitive to context than others. There is no evidence that the best results were achieved at the expense of worse healthcare being offered to vulnerable populations, and there was no association with a reduction in inequalities in healthcare. It would be valuable if the Portuguese Government could stimulate the increase in the number of working USFs, especially in low-density areas, considering that they can achieve better results with lower costs for medicines and diagnostic tests.

Indexed as

EthnicityHealth FacilitiesDelivery of Health CareHumansModels, OrganizationalPrimary Health Carecommissioningcommunity-based health financingcommunity healthcommunity health servicesfamily health unitshealth equityhealth policyprimary healthcaresocio-economic factors

Identifiers

PMID36429538
PMCPMC9690059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.