Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36429449›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Gender Differences of University Students in the Online Teaching Quality and Psychological Profile during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Simone Nomie-Sato, Emilia Condes Moreno, Adriana Rico Villanueva, Pascual Chiarella, Jose Francisco Tornero-Aguilera, Ana Isabel Beltrán-Velasco, Vicente Javier Clemente-Suárez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Simone Nomie-SatoFaculty of Sports Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8229-2478
Emilia Condes MorenoFaculty of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain.
Adriana Rico VillanuevaCentro de Opinión Pública, Universidad del Valle de México, Mexico City 14370, Mexico.
Pascual ChiarellaSchool of Health Sciences, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas, Lima 15023, Peru.
Jose Francisco Tornero-AguileraFaculty of Sports Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0747-8133
Ana Isabel Beltrán-VelascoDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Life and Natural Sciences, University of Nebrija, 28240 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9893-0227
Vicente Javier Clemente-SuárezFaculty of Sports Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2397-2801

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the arrival of COVID-19, educational systems have had to adapt to the social and health situation immediately. This led to the appearance of the asynchronous teaching model. Throughout the pandemic, at the educational level, we can distinguish three phases, eminently online, hybrid, and finally, face-to-face. However, the perception of educational quality in these three educational moments, taking into account the psychometric profile and gender, has not been studied. Thus, 1093 university students from Ibero-American countries were analyzed. Through a questionnaire, demographic, academic, and psychological variables were analyzed at three moments during the evolution of the pandemic. Data suggest that, during the lockdown phase, while teaching was eminently online, students presented higher levels of stress and higher difficulty of learning; class attendance, convenience, preferred method of learning, grading score, and motivation were lower, compared to other phases of teaching (hybrid and face-to-face). During this period, females presented higher stress levels than males, as well as higher levels of anxiety and loneliness, without gender differences among the other studied variables. During the hybrid and face-to-face phases, male students presented higher values in the results of difficulty learning and demanding activities. No differences were seen regarding motivation, synchronous class attendance, learning level, grades, convenience, or preferred learning method. The results from the present study suggest that, despite the effect of the pandemic on mental health, asynchronous education is postulated as an effective teaching-learning alternative. Yet, a special focus should be given to female students.

Indexed as

COVID-19Communicable Disease ControlFemaleHumansMalePandemicsSex FactorsStudentsUnited StatesUniversitiesCOVID-19gender differenceshybrid educationmental healthonline teaching

Identifiers

PMID36429449
PMCPMC9690799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.