Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36429398›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

The Prevalence, Indications, Outcomes of the Most Common Major Gynecological Surgeries in Kazakhstan and Recommendations for Potential Improvements into Public Health and Clinical Practice: Analysis of the National Electronic Healthcare System (2014-2019).

Yesbolat Sakko, Gulzhanat Aimagambetova, Milan Terzic, Talshyn Ukybassova, Gauri Bapayeva, Arnur Gusmanov, Gulnur Zhakhina, Almira Zhantuyakova, Abduzhappar Gaipov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Women's Health and Gynecology: Old Challenges and New Insights.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yesbolat SakkoDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0002-1694-2399
Gulzhanat AimagambetovaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0002-2868-4497
Milan TerzicDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0003-3914-5154
Talshyn UkybassovaClinical Academic Department of Women's Health, CF "University Medical Center", Astana 010000, Kazakhstan.
Gauri BapayevaClinical Academic Department of Women's Health, CF "University Medical Center", Astana 010000, Kazakhstan.
Arnur GusmanovDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0003-2805-8645
Gulnur ZhakhinaDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0002-1001-1374
Almira ZhantuyakovaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Abduzhappar GaipovDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0002-9844-8772

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesMajor gynecological surgeries are indicated for the treatment of female genital pathologies. It is key to examine trends in gynecologic surgical procedures and updated recommendations by international gynecological societies to find opportunities for improvement of local guidelines. To date, a very limited number of reports have been published on the epidemiology of gynecological surgeries in Kazakhstan. Moreover, some local guidelines for gynecological conditions do not comply with the international recommendations. Thus, this study aims to investigate the prevalence, indications, and outcomes of the most common major gynecological surgeries by analyzing large-scale Kazakhstani healthcare data, and identifying possible opportunities for improvement of the local public health and clinical practice.

methodsA descriptive, population-based study among women who underwent a gynecological surgery in healthcare settings across the Republic of Kazakhstan during the period of 2014-2019 was performed. Data were collected from the Unified Nationwide Electronic Health System (UNEHS).

resultsIn total, 80,401 surgery cases were identified and analyzed in the UNEHS database for a period of 6 years (2014-2019). The median age of the participants was 40 years old, with 61.1% in reproductive age. The most prevalent intervention was a unilateral salpingectomy-29.4%, with 72.6% patients aged between 18-34 years. The proportion of different types of hysterectomies was 49.4%. In 20% of cases, subtotal abdominal hysterectomy was performed due to uterine leiomyoma. The proportion of laparoscopic procedures in Kazakhstani gynecological practice is as low-11.59%.

conclusionsThe Kazakhstani public health and gynecological care sector should reinforce implementation of contemporary treatment methods and up-to-date policies and guidelines. The overall trends in surgical procedures performed for gynecological pathologies, including uterine leiomyoma and ectopic pregnancy treatment, should be changed in favor of the minimally invasive methods in order to adopt a fertility-sparing approach.

Indexed as

LeiomyomaPublic HealthAdolescentAdultDelivery of Health CareElectronicsFemaleGynecologic Surgical ProceduresHumansKazakhstanPregnancyPrevalenceYoung AdultepidemiologyhysterectomyKazakhstanoophorectomypublic healthsalpingectomysalpingo-oophorectomy

Identifiers

PMID36429398
PMCPMC9690357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.