ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Lectin Analysis of SARS-CoV-2-Positive Nasopharyngeal Samples Using GLYcoPROFILE
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Identification of SARS-CoV-2-binding lectins on a commercial lectin array.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nasopharyngeal samples are currently accepted as the standard diagnostic samples for nucleic acid amplification testing and antigenic testing for the SARS-CoV-2 virus. In addition to the diagnostic capacity of SARS-CoV-2-positive crude nasopharyngeal samples, their qualitative potential for direct glycan-specific analysis, in order to uncover unique glycol profiles, was assessed. In this study we provide glycan characterization of SARS-CoV-2-positive and -negative nasopharyngeal samples directly from lectin interactions. Although with limited throughput, this study evaluated the clinical sensitivity and specificity of the GLYcoPROFILE® technology platformon45crude nasopharyngeal samples collected between November 2020 and April 2022. Each GLYcoPROFILE® of 39 SARS-CoV-2-positive samples was compared toglycoprofiling on a panel of 10 selected lectins and the results were paralleled with SARS-CoV-2-negative samples’ results. The GLYcoPROFILE® showed a clear distinction between positive and negative samples with WFA, GSL-II, PHA-L (GlcNAc-specific) and BPA (GalNAc-specific) highlighted as relevant lectins in SARS-CoV-2-positive samples. In addition, a significant, positive statistical correlation was found for these lectins (p < 0.01).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.