Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36428875›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

BCNet: A Deep Learning Computer-Aided Diagnosis Framework for Human Peripheral Blood Cell Identification.

Channabasava Chola, Abdullah Y Muaad, Md Belal Bin Heyat, J V Bibal Benifa, Wadeea R Naji, K Hemachandran, Noha F Mahmoud, Nagwan Abdel Samee, Mugahed A Al-Antari, Yasser M Kadah and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Channabasava CholaDepartment of Electronics and Information Convergence Engineering, College of Electronics and Information, Kyung Hee University, Suwon-si 17104, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-7509-9354
Abdullah Y MuaadDepartment of Studies in Computer Science, University of Mysore, Manasagangothri, Mysore 570006, India.ORCID 0000-0001-8304-9261
Md Belal Bin HeyatIoT Research Center, College of Computer Science and Software Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5307-9582
J V Bibal BenifaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Information Technology Kottayam, Kerala 686635, India.
Wadeea R NajiDepartment of Studies in Computer Science, University of Mysore, Manasagangothri, Mysore 570006, India.ORCID 0000-0002-8133-5501
K HemachandranDepartment of Artificial Intelligence, Woxsen University, Hyderabad 502345, India.
Noha F MahmoudRehabilitation Sciences Department, Health and Rehabilitation Sciences College, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-0608-6661
Nagwan Abdel SameeDepartment of Information Technology, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-5957-1383
Mugahed A Al-AntariDepartment of Artificial Intelligence, College of Software and Convergence Technology, Daeyang AI Center, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4457-4407
Yasser M KadahElectrical and Computer Engineering Department, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 22254, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-2166-3191
Tae-Seong KimDepartment of Electronics and Information Convergence Engineering, College of Electronics and Information, Kyung Hee University, Suwon-si 17104, Republic of Korea.
Kyung Hee University · KRPrincess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University · SAUniversity of Mysore · INCairo University · EGIndian Institute of Information Technology Allahabad · INSejong University · KRShenzhen University · CNWoxsen School of Business · IN

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) RS-2022-00166402Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Researchers Supporting Project PNURSP2022R206
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blood cells carry important information that can be used to represent a person's current state of health. The identification of different types of blood cells in a timely and precise manner is essential to cutting the infection risks that people face on a daily basis. The BCNet is an artificial intelligence (AI)-based deep learning (DL) framework that was proposed based on the capability of transfer learning with a convolutional neural network to rapidly and automatically identify the blood cells in an eight-class identification scenario: Basophil, Eosinophil, Erythroblast, Immature Granulocytes, Lymphocyte, Monocyte, Neutrophil, and Platelet. For the purpose of establishing the dependability and viability of BCNet, exhaustive experiments consisting of five-fold cross-validation tests are carried out. Using the transfer learning strategy, we conducted in-depth comprehensive experiments on the proposed BCNet's architecture and test it with three optimizers of ADAM, RMSprop (RMSP), and stochastic gradient descent (SGD). Meanwhile, the performance of the proposed BCNet is directly compared using the same dataset with the state-of-the-art deep learning models of DensNet, ResNet, Inception, and MobileNet. When employing the different optimizers, the BCNet framework demonstrated better classification performance with ADAM and RMSP optimizers. The best evaluation performance was achieved using the RMSP optimizer in terms of 98.51% accuracy and 96.24% F1-score. Compared with the baseline model, the BCNet clearly improved the prediction accuracy performance 1.94%, 3.33%, and 1.65% using the optimizers of ADAM, RMSP, and SGD, respectively. The proposed BCNet model outperformed the AI models of DenseNet, ResNet, Inception, and MobileNet in terms of the testing time of a single blood cell image by 10.98, 4.26, 2.03, and 0.21 msec. In comparison to the most recent deep learning models, the BCNet model could be able to generate encouraging outcomes. It is essential for the advancement of healthcare facilities to have such a recognition rate improving the detection performance of the blood cells.

Indexed as

blood celldeep transfer learningmulti-class identificationnew BCNet frameworkverification and validation

Identifiers

PMID36428875
PMCPMC9689932
OpenAlexW4309269102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.