ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Predictive Value of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance for Left Ventricular Remodeling of Patients with Acute Anterior Myocardial Infarction.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Multi-Faceted Utility of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Editorial on Special Issue "Advances in Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance".Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Infarct size and long-term left ventricular remodelling in acute myocardial infarction patients subjected to transcoronary delivery of progenitor cells.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Heart failure is a serious complication resulting from left ventricular remodeling (LVR), especially in patients experiencing acute anterior myocardial infarction (AAMI). It is crucial to explore the predictive parameters for LVR following primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) in patients with AAMI. Methods: A total of 128 AAMI patients who were reperfused successfully by PPCI were enrolled sequentially from June 2018 to December 2019. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) was performed at the early stage (<7 days) and after the 6-month follow-up. The patients were divided into LVR and non-LVR groups according to the increase of left ventricular end diastolic volume (LVEDV) measured by the second cardiac magnetic resonance examination ≥20% from baseline. (3) Results: The left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), the global longitudinal strain (GLS), the peak circumferential strain in infarcted segments, and the infarct size (IS) remained significantly different in the multivariate logistic regression analysis (all p < 0.05). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of Model 1, wherein the GLS was added to the LVEF, was 0.832 (95% CI 0.758−0.907, p < 0.001). The C-statistics for Model 2, which included the infarct-related regional parameters (IS and the peak circumferential strain in infarcted segments)was 0.917 (95% CI 0.870−0.965, p < 0.001). Model 2 was statistically superior to Model 1 in predicting LVR (IDI: 0.190, p = 0.002). (4) Conclusions: Both the global and regional CMR parameters were valuable in predicting LVR in patients with AAMI following the PPCI. The local parameters of the infarct zones were superior to those of the global ones.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.