ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Performance of the New 2019 European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology/American College of Rheumatology Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Classification Criteria in a Large Unicentric Cohort.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical significance of exostosin 1 in confirmed and suspected lupus membranous nephropathy.Lupus science & medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The recently published 2019 American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (ACR/EULAR) classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) were developed to increase the reliability and identification of SLE, especially in early disease. With the emergence of several new drugs for SLE, identifying and treating patients early are more important than ever. Methods: Data of 446 SLE patients evaluated in our center between 1996−2019 and 226 controls with other autoimmune diseases evaluated between 2001−2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The sensitivity and specificity of the 2019 ACR/EULAR criteria were compared to the 2012 SLICC and the 1997 ACR criteria. Results: The 2019 ACR/EULAR criteria showed very good sensitivity (86.6%) compared to the 1997 ACR criteria (76.7%), p < 0.001, with a trend toward significance compared to the 2012 SLICC criteria (83.6%), p = 0.072. Their sensitivity remained high (87.6%) in patients with a short disease duration. The specificity of the 2019 ACR/EULAR criteria (91.2%) was statistically lower than the 2012 SLICC (96.0%) and 1997 ACR criteria (95.1%), p = 0.007 and p = 0.012, respectively, but still had a very high value. A total of 22 controls (9.7%) fulfilled at least one set of criteria (15 patients with MCTD, 5 with UCTD, and 2 with SSc). Conclusion: In this large real-life cohort, the 2019 ACR/EULAR criteria had very good performance compared to the 2012 SLICC and 1997 ACR criteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.