Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36428836›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

The Diagnostic Accuracy of Pure-Tone Audiometry Screening Protocols for Vestibular Schwannoma in Patients with Asymmetrical Hearing Loss-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Liliana Gheorghe, Dragos Negru, Mihail Dan Cobzeanu, Octavian Dragos Palade, Eosefina Gina Botnariu, Bogdan Mihail Cobzeanu, Maria-Luiza Cobzeanu

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Changes of video head impulse test before and after translabyrinthectomy in patients with acoustic neuroma.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Liliana GheorgheSurgical Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Grigore T. Popa", 700115 Iasi, Romania.
Dragos NegruSurgical Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Grigore T. Popa", 700115 Iasi, Romania.
Mihail Dan CobzeanuSurgical Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Grigore T. Popa", 700115 Iasi, Romania.
Octavian Dragos PaladeSurgical Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Grigore T. Popa", 700115 Iasi, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-3002-7530
Eosefina Gina BotnariuEmergency Clinical Hospital "Sfântul Spiridon" Iasi, 700111 Iasi, Romania.
Bogdan Mihail CobzeanuSurgical Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Grigore T. Popa", 700115 Iasi, Romania.
Maria-Luiza CobzeanuSurgical Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Grigore T. Popa", 700115 Iasi, Romania.
Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy · ROClinical Emergency Hospital Bucharest · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the gold standard investigation for all patients who present with asymmetrical hearing loss (AHL) and a high index of suspicion for vestibular schwannoma (VS). However, pure-tone audiometry (PTA) is an investigation that can be used for the screening of these patients in order to reduce the costs. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of different PTA protocols for VS in patients with ASHL, when compared with MRI; (2) Methods: Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases were used to find relevant studies. All prospective and retrospective observational studies that evaluated the accuracy of PTA protocols for the screening of VS were assessed, according to the international guidelines; (3) Results: We analyzed seven studies (4369 patients) of poor-to-moderate quality. Their pooled sensitivity was good (0.73-0.93), but their specificity was low (0.31-0.60). All protocols were located in the right lower quadrant on the likelihood scattergram, and the post-test probabilities for positive and negative diagnosis of these protocols were extremely low; (4) Conclusions: PTA protocols cannot be used for a proper screening or diagnosis of vestibular schwannoma despite their good sensibility, and MRI remains the gold standard for this purpose.

Indexed as

acoustic neuromamagnetic resonance imagingpure-tone audiometryvestibular schwannoma

Identifiers

PMID36428836
PMCPMC9689241
OpenAlexW4309002775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.