Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36428798›Full record

ReviewCancers2022

COVID-19 and Lung Cancer Survival: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Simone Oldani, Fausto Petrelli, Giuseppina Dognini, Karen Borgonovo, Maria Chiara Parati, Mara Ghilardi, Lorenzo Dottorini, Mary Cabiddu, Andrea Luciani

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Coronavirus disease 2019 and lung cancer: where are we?Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Simone OldaniOncology Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, 24047 Treviglio (BG), Italy.
Fausto PetrelliOncology Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, 24047 Treviglio (BG), Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9639-4486
Giuseppina DogniniOncology Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, 24047 Treviglio (BG), Italy.
Karen BorgonovoOncology Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, 24047 Treviglio (BG), Italy.
Maria Chiara ParatiOncology Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, 24047 Treviglio (BG), Italy.
Mara GhilardiOncology Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, 24047 Treviglio (BG), Italy.
Lorenzo DottoriniOncology Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, 24047 Treviglio (BG), Italy.
Mary CabidduOncology Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, 24047 Treviglio (BG), Italy.
Andrea LucianiOncology Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, 24047 Treviglio (BG), Italy.
Azienda Ospedaliera Treviglio · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The outbreak of COVID-19 poses an unprecedented challenge to global public health. Patients with cancer are at a higher risk during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Patients with lung cancer and COVID-19 were compared to those without cancer and those with other malignancies for the main outcome of this study. The aim of this study was to evaluate the differences in susceptibility, disease severity, and mortality between lung cancer patients and the general population. Methods: Using PRISMA reporting guidelines, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the published literature. The Cochrane Library database, PubMed, EMBASE, and PubMed Central were comprehensively searched for published papers until 31 May 2022. A pooled risk ratio (OR) with 95% CI was presented as the result of this meta-analysis. Results: We included 29 studies involved 21,257 patients with lung cancer and SARS-CoV-2 infection. Analysis data showed that mortality in patients with lung cancer was significantly higher than that in patients without cancer (HR = 2.00 [95%CI 1.52, 2.63], p < 0.01) or with other malignancies (HR = 1.91 [95%CI 1.53, 2.39], p < 0.01). In addition, we also observed a higher risk of severe infection in terms of life-threatening or required ICU admission/mechanical ventilation for lung cancer patients (HR = 1.47 [95%CI 1.06, 2.03], p = 0.02) than for patients with no cancer or other malignancies. Regarding lung cancer as a risk factor for acquiring SARS-CoV-2 infection, we could not reach statistical significance (hazard ratio [HR] =2.73 [95%CI 0.84, 8.94], p = 0.1). Conclusion: Lung cancer represents an important comorbidity and modifies COVID-19 prognosis in terms of disease severity and mortality. More patients experience severe or even fatal events. Considering their inherent fragility, patients with lung cancer, and generally all oncological populations, should be treated more carefully during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19lung cancermeta-analysismortalityrisk

Identifiers

PMID36428798
PMCPMC9688481
OpenAlexW4309739338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.