ReviewCancers2022
The Impact of Clonal Hierarchy and Heterogeneity on Phenotypic Manifestations of Myelodysplastic Neoplasms.
Review in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Long-term mutational analysis, clonal metrics, and dynamics in patients with chronic idiopathic neutropenia.HemaSphere · 2026Article
- Real-World Clinical Outcomes of Azacitidine Versus Best Supportive Care in Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Neoplasms: A Single-Center Cohort Study.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Navigating the New Era in Myelodysplastic Neoplasms: A Review of Prognostic Implications of the IPSS-M Score and 2022 WHO Classification.Hematology reports · 2025Review
- Comparative Analysis of IPSS, IPSS-R, and WPSS for Predicting Survival and Leukemic Transformation in Myelodysplastic Neoplasms: A Real-World Single-Center Experience.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Measurable (Minimal) Residual Disease in Myelodysplastic Neoplasms (MDS): Current State and Perspectives.Cancers · 2024Review
- Regulation of Pre-mRNA Splicing: Indispensable Role of Post-Translational Modifications of Splicing Factors.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Until recently, conventional prognostication of myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) was performed using the revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R), with additional adverse prognoses conferred by select mutations. Nonetheless, the clonal diversity and dynamics of coexisting mutations have been shown to alter the prognosis and treatment response in patients with MDS. Often in the process of clonal evolution, various initial hits are preferentially followed by a specific spectrum of secondary alterations, shaping the phenotypic and biologic features of MDS. Our ability to recapitulate the clonal ontology of MDS is a necessary step toward personalized therapy and the conceptualization of a better classification system, which ideally would take into consideration all genomic aberrations and their inferred clonal architecture in individual cases. In this review, we summarize our current understanding of the molecular landscape of MDS and the role of mutational combinations, clonal burden, and clonal hierarchy in defining the clinical fate of the disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.