ReviewCancers2022
Artificial Intelligence for Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment of Prostate Cancer.
Review in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Exploring the role of artificial intelligence in chemotherapy development, cancer diagnosis, and treatment: present achievements and future outlook.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Present status of prostate cancer diagnosis, limitations, challenges, and future endeavors.Annals of medicine · 2026Review
- Article
- Reproducibility of natural-language-driven statistical workflows compared with conventional software for diagnostic metrics in prostate cancer research.Investigative and clinical urology · 2026Article
- Advancements in nanobiosensors for early cancer detection, challenges, treatment, and future prospects: a comprehensive review.Discover nano · 2026Review
- AI-driven precision diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer: a narrative review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in prostate biopsy: diagnostic applications, risk stratification, and precision oncology.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Network toxicology & molecular docking: endocrine-disrupting chemicals induce prostate cancer - a system study.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based comparison of transperineal vs. transrectal biopsy for prostate cancer diagnosis: evaluating procedural effectiveness.The Canadian journal of urology · 2025Article
- Transforming Prostate Cancer Care: Innovations in Diagnosis, Treatment, and Future Directions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Lesion detection using artificial intelligence models in MR images of prostate cancer and prostatitis patients and comparison of model performance.Frontiers in urology · 2025Article
- A Comprehensive Review of Silver and Gold Nanoparticles as Effective Antibacterial Agents.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Article
- Review
- The Application of Radiomics and AI to Molecular Imaging for Prostate Cancer.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
- A decision support system to recommend appropriate therapy protocol for AML patients.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2024Article
- Preliminary study on miRNA in prostate cancer.World journal of surgical oncology · 2023Article
- Article
- Deep learning techniques for imaging diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma: current and emerging trends.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Embedded Sensor Systems in Medical Devices: Requisites and Challenges Ahead.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As medical science and technology progress towards the era of "big data", a multi-dimensional dataset pertaining to medical diagnosis and treatment is becoming accessible for mathematical modelling. However, these datasets are frequently inconsistent, noisy, and often characterized by a significant degree of redundancy. Thus, extensive data processing is widely advised to clean the dataset before feeding it into the mathematical model. In this context, Artificial intelligence (AI) techniques, including machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) algorithms based on artificial neural networks (ANNs) and their types, are being used to produce a precise and cross-sectional illustration of clinical data. For prostate cancer patients, datasets derived from the prostate-specific antigen (PSA), MRI-guided biopsies, genetic biomarkers, and the Gleason grading are primarily used for diagnosis, risk stratification, and patient monitoring. However, recording diagnoses and further stratifying risks based on such diagnostic data frequently involves much subjectivity. Thus, implementing an AI algorithm on a PC's diagnostic data can reduce the subjectivity of the process and assist in decision making. In addition, AI is used to cut down the processing time and help with early detection, which provides a superior outcome in critical cases of prostate cancer. Furthermore, this also facilitates offering the service at a lower cost by reducing the amount of human labor. Herein, the prime objective of this review is to provide a deep analysis encompassing the existing AI algorithms that are being deployed in the field of prostate cancer (PC) for diagnosis and treatment. Based on the available literature, AI-powered technology has the potential for extensive growth and penetration in PC diagnosis and treatment to ease and expedite the existing medical process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.