Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36428661›Full record

ReviewCancers2022

Evaluating Different Quantitative Shear Wave Parameters of Ultrasound Elastography in the Diagnosis of Lymph Node Malignancies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Yujia Gao, Yi Zhao, Sunyoung Choi, Anjalee Chaurasia, Hao Ding, Athar Haroon, Simon Wan, Sola Adeleke

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Yujia GaoUCL Medical School, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4857-5140
Yi ZhaoImperial College London, School of Medicine, London SW7 2DD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4563-4344
Sunyoung ChoiGKT School of Medicine, King's College London, London WC2R 2LS, UK.
Anjalee ChaurasiaImperial College London, School of Medicine, London SW7 2DD, UK.
Hao DingImperial College London, School of Medicine, London SW7 2DD, UK.
Athar HaroonDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Barts Health NHS Trust, London E1 1BB, UK.
Simon WanInstitute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London, London NW1 2BU, UK.
Sola AdelekeDepartment of Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London SE1 9RT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4388-8754
Imperial College London · GBKing's College London · GBUniversity College London · GBBarts Health NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shear wave elastography (SWE) has shown promise in distinguishing lymph node malignancies. However, the diagnostic accuracies of various SWE parameters that quantify tissue stiffness are yet to be demonstrated. To evaluate the pooled diagnostic accuracy of different SWE parameters for differentiating lymph node malignancies, we conducted a systematic screening of four databases using the PRISMA guidelines. Lymph node biopsy was adopted as the reference standard. E

Indexed as

elastographylymph node malignancylymphomashear wave elastography (SWE)ultrasound elastography

Identifiers

PMID36428661
PMCPMC9688428
OpenAlexW4309002543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.