Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36428653›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

Differences in Durability of PARP Inhibition by Clinically Approved PARP Inhibitors: Implications for Combinations and Scheduling.

Hannah L Smith, Elaine Willmore, Asima Mukhopadhyay, Yvette Drew, Nicola J Curtin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hannah L SmithFaculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK.
Elaine WillmoreFaculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK.
Asima MukhopadhyayKolkata Gynecological Oncology Trials and Translational Research Group, Chittaranjan National Cancer Institute, 37 SP Mukherjee Road, Kolkata 700026, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0761-9562
Yvette DrewBC Cancer Centre Vancouver and Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6676-9224
Nicola J CurtinFaculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1369-1843

Funding

CRUK/Department of Biotechnology India N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Six PARP inhibitors (PARPi) are approved for cancer therapy as monotherapy agents in daily or twice-daily continuous dosing schedules to maintain the necessary continuous suppression of PARP activity. Continuous PARP inhibition is required for single-agent anticancer activity. To investigate if such intense schedules are necessary, we determined the durability of PARP inhibition up to 72 h after a 1 h pulse of 1 µM of five of the approved PARPi, rucaparib, olaparib, niraparib, talazoparib and pamiparib, in IGROV-1 and ES-2 (human ovarian cancer) cells. Rucaparib caused the most persistent inhibition of PARP activity when maintained at ≥75% at 72 h after drug withdrawal in both IGROV-1 and ES-2 cells, but inhibition was more rapidly lost with the other PARPi. PARPi are also under clinical investigation with ATR inhibitors, and thus, we evaluated the implications for scheduling with an ATR inhibitor (VE-821). Rucaparib enhanced VE-821 cytotoxicity in co-exposure, sequential and delayed (24 h drug-free) schedules in IGROV-1 and ES-2 cells. Olaparib and niraparib enhanced VE-821 cytotoxicity only in co-exposed cells and not in sequential exposures. These data have clinical implications for the scheduling of PARPi as a monotherapy and in combination with ATR inhibitors and other cytotoxic drugs.

Indexed as

ATRDDRdurabilityPARP1

Identifiers

PMID36428653
PMCPMC9688250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.