Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36428609›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

EUS-Guided Gastroenterostomy in Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction: A Comparative Study between First- and Second-Line Approaches after Enteral Stent Placement.

Enrique Perez-Cuadrado-Robles, Hadrien Alric, Ali Aidibi, Michiel Bronswijk, Giuseppe Vanella, Claire Gallois, Hedi Benosman, Emilia Ragot, Claire Rives-Lange, Gabriel Rahmi and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Updated Classification of EUS-Guided Gastroenterostomy Misdeployment.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy: a review.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Enrique Perez-Cuadrado-RoblesDepartment of Gastroenterology, Georges-Pompidou European Hospital, 75015 Paris, France.
Hadrien AlricDepartment of Gastroenterology, Georges-Pompidou European Hospital, 75015 Paris, France.
Ali AidibiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Georges-Pompidou European Hospital, 75015 Paris, France.
Michiel BronswijkDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, University of Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-2039-5022
Giuseppe VanellaPancreatobiliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7280-1761
Claire GalloisFaculty of Medicine, University of Paris-Cité, 75006 Paris, France.
Hedi BenosmanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Georges-Pompidou European Hospital, 75015 Paris, France.
Emilia RagotDepartment of Surgery, Georges-Pompidou European Hospital, 75015 Paris, France.
Claire Rives-LangeFaculty of Medicine, University of Paris-Cité, 75006 Paris, France.
Gabriel RahmiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Georges-Pompidou European Hospital, 75015 Paris, France.
Christophe CellierDepartment of Gastroenterology, Georges-Pompidou European Hospital, 75015 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0784-2318
Université Paris Cité · FRHôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou · FRImelda Hospital · BEVita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEndoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) is increasingly used in the setting of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO). However, little is known about the role of primary EUS-GE. The aim of the present study is to compare the outcomes of EUS-GE by using the freehand technique as a first- and second-line approach after enteral stenting (ES).

methodsThis is an observational single-center study using a prospectively collected database. All consecutive patients who underwent an EUS-GE using the freehand technique due to malignant GOO were included. Patients with previous gastric surgery, a wire-guided EUS-GE technique, or those presenting without GOO were excluded. The primary outcome was the clinical success, defined as a solid oral intake at 1 week after the procedure (GOO Score, GOOSS ≥ 2). The secondary outcomes were technical success and adverse event (AE) rates. The impact on nutritional parameters was also assessed.

resultsForty-five patients underwent an EUS-GE for all indications. Finally, 28 patients (mean age: 63 ± 17.2 years, 57.1% male) with (

conclusionsEUS-GE achieves a high technical and clinical success in patients with GOO regardless of the presence of a previous ES. Patients with previous ES may have a quicker progression of their diet, but the GOOSS and nutritional status in the long term at 1 week or 1 month are comparable. Primary EUS-GE might require fewer procedures and less discontinuation of chemotherapy to achieve a comparable result.

Indexed as

endoscopic ultrasoundgastric outlet obstructionLAMSpancreatic cancer

Identifiers

PMID36428609
PMCPMC9688477
OpenAlexW4308874320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.