ArticleBiomedicines2022
Lymph Node Ratio in Head and Neck Cancer with Submental Flap Reconstruction.
Article in Biomedicines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tumor Surface Necrosis on Laryngoscopy Predicts Prognosis in Hypopharyngeal Carcinoma.The Laryngoscope · 2026Article
- Editorial of Special Issue "Oral Cancer: From Pathophysiology to Novel Therapeutic Approaches".Biomedicines · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the lymph node ratio (LNR) and survival results of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) reconstructed by a submental artery flap (SMAF) to limit tumor size. This study retrospectively recruited 49 patients with HNSCC who underwent both primary resection and neck dissection with SMAF reconstruction. The LNR was the ratio of the number of metastatic lymph nodes to the sum number of examined lymph nodes. A LNR of 0.04 was the best cut-off value for HNSCC-specific death on receiver operating curve analysis. Patients with LNRs > 0.04 were univariately related to cancer-specific, disease-free, distant metastasis-free, and locoregional recurrence-free survival than those with LNRs ≤ 0.04 by log-rank test. In a Cox’s proportional hazards model with hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) adjusting for pathological stage, extranodal extension and or surgical margins, the LNR (>0.04/≤0.04) predicted multivariate shorter cancer-specific (HR = 9.24, 95% CI = 1.49−176), disease-free (HR = 3.44, 95% CI = 1.23−10.3), and distant metastasis-free (HR = 9.76, 95% CI = 1.57−187) survival. In conclusion, LNR for patients of HNSCC with SMAF reconstruction for limited tumor size was a prognostic factor for survival outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.