Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36428423›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2022

Effects of Feeding and Drinking Behavior on Performance and Carcass Traits in Beef Cattle.

Bianca V Pires, Henrique G Reolon, Natalya G Abduch, Luana L Souza, Leandro S Sakamoto, Maria Eugênia Z Mercadante, Rafael M O Silva, Breno O Fragomeni, Fernando Baldi, Claudia C P Paz and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Mitigation and animal response to water stress in small ruminants.Animal frontiers : the review magazine of animal agriculture · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Bianca V PiresBeef Cattle Research Center, Institute of Animal Science (IZ), Sertãozinho 14160-900, SP, Brazil.
Henrique G ReolonBeef Cattle Research Center, Institute of Animal Science (IZ), Sertãozinho 14160-900, SP, Brazil.
Natalya G AbduchDepartment of Genetics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo (USP), Ribeirão Preto 140349-900, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2496-8046
Luana L SouzaDepartment of Animal Science, School of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal 14884-900, SP, Brazil.
Leandro S SakamotoBeef Cattle Research Center, Institute of Animal Science (IZ), Sertãozinho 14160-900, SP, Brazil.
Maria Eugênia Z MercadanteBeef Cattle Research Center, Institute of Animal Science (IZ), Sertãozinho 14160-900, SP, Brazil.
Rafael M O SilvaZoetis, Sao Paulo 04710-230, SP, Brazil.
Breno O FragomeniDepartment of Animal Science, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA.
Fernando BaldiDepartment of Animal Science, School of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal 14884-900, SP, Brazil.
Claudia C P PazBeef Cattle Research Center, Institute of Animal Science (IZ), Sertãozinho 14160-900, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7267-4552
Nedenia B StafuzzaBeef Cattle Research Center, Institute of Animal Science (IZ), Sertãozinho 14160-900, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6432-2330
Institute of Animal Science and Pastures · BRUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversity of Connecticut · US

Funding

São Paulo Research Foundation 2018/19216-7
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Feed and water efficiency are important traits to improve beef cattle production’s economic and environmental sustainability. This study evaluated residual feed intake (RFI) and residual water intake (RWI) and their relationship with performance, ingestive behavior, and carcass traits in Caracu beef cattle. The data were analyzed using a generalized linear model with least squares means. The ingestive behavior, performance, and carcass traits were influenced by sex (p < 0.05). Males showed higher dry matter intake (DMI), average daily gain (ADG), mid-test metabolic weight (BW0.75), rib eye area, and rump fat thickness than females, besides spending more time drinking and eating. Low RFI animals exhibited higher DMI than high RFI animals. Low RWI animals ingested 3.89 L/d of water further than high RWI animals. The interaction between sex and RWI influenced the DMI, BW0.75, and backfat thickness. The ingestive behavior of low and high RFI animals was similar, although high RWI animals visited a smaller number of drinkers than low RWI animals. Water intake positively affects productive efficiency, and the combined use of RWI and RFI may help improve the selection of more efficient animals contributing to reducing the costs of beef cattle production and improving environmental sustainability.

Indexed as

feeding rateresidual feed intakeresidual water intake

Identifiers

PMID36428423
PMCPMC9686570
OpenAlexW4309738695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.