Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literature
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Kasumi SuzukiSwine and Poultry Research Department, Gifu Prefectural Livestock Research Institute, Seki 501-3924, Japan.
Hiroki ShinkaiNational Institute of Animal Health, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (NARO), Tsukuba 305-0856, Japan.
Gou YoshiokaSwine and Poultry Research Department, Gifu Prefectural Livestock Research Institute, Seki 501-3924, Japan.
Toshimi MatsumotoInstitute of Agrobiological Sciences, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (NARO), Tsukuba 305-8634, Japan.
Takato TakenouchiInstitute of Agrobiological Sciences, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (NARO), Tsukuba 305-8634, Japan.
Junji TanakaSwine and Poultry Research Department, Gifu Prefectural Livestock Research Institute, Seki 501-3924, Japan.
Masanori ShimizuSwine and Poultry Research Department, Gifu Prefectural Livestock Research Institute, Seki 501-3924, Japan.
Haruki KitazawaFood and Feed Immunology Group, Laboratory of Animal Food Function, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8572, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4586-5553
Hirohide UenishiInstitute of Agrobiological Sciences, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (NARO), Tsukuba 305-8634, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3899-9580
National Agriculture and Food Research Organization · JPGifu Prefectural Research Institute for Forests · JPTohoku University · JP
Funding
Bio-oriented Technology Research Advancement Institution 01002ABio-oriented Technology Research Advancement Institution 01002AB2Japan Racing Association 30-22Japan Racing Association R04-50
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
Reduced productivity caused by infections, particularly respiratory diseases, is a serious problem in pig farming. We have previously reported polymorphisms in porcine pattern recognition receptor genes affecting molecular functions and demonstrated that the 2197A/C polymorphism in the nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain containing 2 (
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Polymorphisms in Pattern Recognition Receptor Genes Are Associated with Respiratory Disease Severity in Pig Farms. · full record | OpenQuestion