Endangered Nectar-Feeding Bat Detected by Environmental DNA on Flowers.

Faith M Walker, Daniel E Sanchez, Emma M Froehlich, Emma L Federman, Jacque A Lyman, Meagan Owens, Kristen Lear

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

4citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

Agave distribution and floral display influence foraging rates of an endangered pollinating bat and implications for conservation.Ecology and evolution · 2024
Article
Spider webs capture environmental DNA from terrestrial vertebrates.iScience · 2024
Article
Out of thin air: surveying tropical bat roosts through air sampling of eDNA.PeerJ · 2023
Article
Looking to the past to inform the future: What eDNA from herbarium specimens can tell us about plant-animal interactions.Applications in plant sciences
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Faith M WalkerBat Ecology & Genetics Lab, School of Forestry, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8435-4452

Daniel E SanchezBat Ecology & Genetics Lab, School of Forestry, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, USA.

Emma M FroehlichBat Ecology & Genetics Lab, School of Forestry, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, USA.

Emma L FedermanBat Ecology & Genetics Lab, School of Forestry, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, USA.

Jacque A LymanBat Ecology & Genetics Lab, School of Forestry, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, USA.

Meagan OwensBat Ecology & Genetics Lab, School of Forestry, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, USA.

Kristen LearIntegrative Conservation and Forestry & Natural Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.

Funding

CSRD VA 1Garden Club of America 2018National Geographic Society 201803National Science Foundation 1443117Species from Feces 2018Texas Parks and Wildlife Department CA-0001908Wellcome Trust 201804

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

ChiropteraDNA metabarcodingeDNAenvironmental DNAhigh-throughput nucleotide sequencingpollination

Identifiers

PMID36428303

DOI10.3390/ani12223075

PMCPMC9686659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.