Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36428289›Full record

ArticleSkin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI)2023

Study of event-related potentials by withdrawal friction on the fingertip.

Chen Si, Huang Qin, Yang Chuanzhuang, Tang Wei, Xu Lin

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Study of event-related potentials by withdrawal friction on the fingertip.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chen SiResearch Center of Fluid Machinery Engineering and Technology, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China.
Huang QinResearch Center of Fluid Machinery Engineering and Technology, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China.
Yang ChuanzhuangResearch Center of Fluid Machinery Engineering and Technology, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China.
Tang WeiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, China.
Xu LinResearch Center of Fluid Machinery Engineering and Technology, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9037-983X
Jiangsu University · CNChina University of Mining and Technology · CN

Funding

China Postdoctoral Science Foundation Funded Project 2018M632239Jiangsu Planned Projects for Postdoctoral Research Funds 1701063CNational Natural Science Foundation of China 51805218National Natural Science Foundation of China 51875566National Natural Science Foundation of China 51905222Youth project of Jiangsu Natural Science Foundation of China BK20170552
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe lack of understanding about the brain's reaction processes in perceiving touch and separation between skin and object surfaces is a barrier to the development of existing brain-computer interface technologies and virtual haptics. These technologies are limited in their ability to advance. It leaves prosthesis users with a limited amount of tactile information that they can feel. This study aims to determine whether distinct surface aspects of various items trigger different reactions from the brain when friction is removed from the surface.

methodsWhen friction is suddenly removed from the surface of an item, a technique called event-related potential, (ERP) is used to study the features of people's EEGs. It is done after the subject has actively explored the object's surface. A 64-channels EEG collecting system was utilized to acquire EEG data from the individuals. [Corrections added on 5 December 2022, after first online publication: The preceding sentence has been updated.] The event-related potentials for friction removal were generated using the Oddball paradigm, and the samples consisted of sandpaper with three distinct degrees of roughness. We utilized a total of 20 participants, 10 of whom were male, and 10 of whom were female, with a mean age of 21 years.

resultsIt was discovered that the P3 component of event-related potentials, which is essential for cognition, was noticeably absent in the friction withdrawal response for various roughnesses. It was the case regardless of whether the surface was smooth or rough. Moreover, there was no statistically significant difference between the P1 andP2 components, which suggests that the brain could not recognize the surface properties of objects with varying roughness as the friction withdrawal was being performed.

conclusionsIt has been demonstrated that tactile recognition does not occur after friction withdrawal. The findings of this paper could have significant repercussions for future research involving the study of haptic perception and brain-computer interaction in prosthetic hands. It is a step toward future research on the mechanisms underlying human tactile perception, so think of it as preparation.

Indexed as

TouchTouch PerceptionAdultEvoked PotentialsFemaleFingersFrictionHumansMaleSkinYoung AdultEEGevent-related potentialsskin frictiontactile perception

Identifiers

PMID36428289
PMCPMC9838764
OpenAlexW4310297026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.